I agree with this. For those that thought Bush should hold Roberts back, I think you need to get the first one thru before you can put up the really contentious picks.
Here is what the left is saying about Judge Roberts:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1446998/posts
The left's not happy, but a guy who was first in his class at Harvard Law, with as few written opinions as he has will be tough to stop. A fillibuster won't stick, IMO.
In other words, concede defeat in order to win later even though you won the election? Why not just nominate the kind of judge you think belongs on the bench?