HILLARY FLUNKS D.C. BAR EXAM ("the smartest woman in the world" seeks less competitive venue)

Living History | 06.18.05 | Mia T, hillary clinton

[Founding Father]

but, but, but you're talking about the Bush family's new best friends....

[Peach]

Good job, Mia. Sing it because we can't expect to hear it anywhere but here and a few media outlets.

[ml/nj]

This reminded me of something I wrote a long time ago:

From time to time I am asked about my use of the Ulasewicz name when I refer to the Commodities Scam Queen. This has happened again this week, and I reply publicly for others who might have the same question.

Anthony Ulasewicz was known to many as the "Bag man of Watergate." He told the Ervin Committee tales of delivering bags of cash to the various providers of "Special Services" that apparently required in the machinations that eventually became known as "Watergate."

It seems to me that Hillary was assigned a similar task in the machinations that have come to be known as "Whitewater."

Shortly after the Dynamic Duo captured the White House I started a thread in another venue which I called, "Bill ... or Hillary?" It started off as follows:

Forget "To be or not to be," Bill or Hillary? THAT is the question!

Which one is more slimy? Which one is more deceitful? We NEED a yardstick. We need some way to quantify this.

I propose a new measure to be known as the Deceit Quotient, or DQ for short. Like the Richter scale, the DQ will be open-ended. ...

Implicit in this was the question of who was leading whom. When I posed the question, I really wasn't sure what I thought myself.

Since then I've developed the opinion that Hillary's entire persona is a fraud. I'm not sure what she has ever done or said that seems even remotely clever or smart. Bill, on the other hand, isn't called "Slick" for nothing. If he were dependent upon her for ideas or guidance, he never would have become Arkansas Attorney General, let alone President.

Hillary has been little more than this guy's bag lady. Does anyone really think the Commodities Scam money was being supplied as a "special fee" for some service Hillary was providing? Does anyone really think that Miss Smartest Woman in the World's meteoric rise at the Rose Law Firm would have occurred without her hubby's "coincidental" political successes? She's no more leading anyone here around by the nose than Tony Ulasewicz was the mastermind of the Watergate cover-up.

Hillary Rodham [Ulasewicz] Clinton almost certainly has the wherewithal to destroy Slick Willie Clinton but she cannot do so without destroying her own self too. SWC and his people know she will not do this and so hold the big trump. They are the ones doing the leading, telling HRUC to dress pretty in pink, to bake cookies, pander to children, or whatever. She may gripe in private, but when it's showtime she's the one doing the jumping.

ML/NJ

[RobFromGa]

bump for fine work...

[Ed_in_NJ]

Any truth to the rumor that you've been invited to speak at the Bent Willie Liebury in Little Rocks?

[anniegetyourgun]

You're an FR treasure, MiaT.

[skinkinthegrass]

THANKS, Mia T. :D

[skinkinthegrass]

I propose a new measure to be known as the Deceit Quotient, or DQ for short. Like the Richter scale, the DQ will be open-ended. ...

Good Point...just make sure the MSM, isn't determining the "benchmarks" (reference points)...or they'll all be Republican (Conservative) 8^|

[skinkinthegrass]

Any truth to the rumor that you've been invited to speak at the Bent Willie Liebury in Little Rocks?

HA! HA! LOL!..(just don't fly/drive alone :)..take a Commercial Airliner/Greyhound Bus (in disguise, of course). :D

[sandydipper]

Never forget that the clintoons were a blight on this country and the ideals we cherish. Surely hell has a room reserved for the two of them.

Thanks Mia T.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

You go, Mia T !!!!!!!!!!!!

[Mia T]

ping

[Squantos]

Not to worry Mia... I just watched a show on the discovery channel about when a queen bee runs out of stored up sperm her worker bees kill her.......

Great thread Mia ! Well Done !

Stay safe !

[bmwcyle]

bttt

[Fiddlstix]

[YaYa123]

All week long, Durbin has reminded me of Bill Clinton. There's really not much difference between "non-denial denials", and "non-apology apologies". And not much difference in dick heads either.

Senator Warner had Dick Durbin spinning like a top on the senate floor, so that finally yesterday, Durbin was forced into issuing a Clintonesque apology. Here's a blast from the past to prove my point...Clinton's apology to the nation, from August, 1998:

___________________________________________________________

Text of Clinton's Statement
Tuesday, August 18, 1998;

Following are President Clinton's remarks last night on his grand jury testimony and the investigation by independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr:

Good evening. This afternoon in this room, from this chair, I testified before the Office of Independent Counsel and the grand jury. I answered their questions truthfully, including questions about my private life, questions no American citizen would ever want to answer.

Still, I must take complete responsibility for all my actions, both public and private. And that is why I am speaking to you tonight. As you know, in a deposition in January, I was asked questions about my relationship with Monica Lewinsky. While my answers were legally accurate, I did not volunteer information.

Indeed, I did have a relationship with Miss Lewinsky that was not appropriate. In fact, it was wrong. It constituted a critical lapse in judgment and a personal failure on my part for which I am solely and completely responsible. But I told the grand jury today and I say to you now that at no time did I ask anyone to lie, to hide or destroy evidence or to take any other unlawful action.

I know that my public comments and my silence about this matter gave a false impression. I misled people, including even my wife. I deeply regret that. I can only tell you I was motivated by many factors. First, by a desire to protect myself from the embarrassment of my own conduct. I was also very concerned about protecting my family. The fact that these questions were being asked in a politically inspired lawsuit, which has since been dismissed, was a consideration, too.

In addition, I had real and serious concerns about an independent counsel investigation that began with private business dealings 20 years ago, dealings, I might add, about which an independent federal agency found no evidence of any wrongdoing by me or my wife over two years ago. The independent counsel investigation moved on to my staff and friends, then into my private life. And now the investigation itself is under investigation.

This has gone on too long, cost too much and hurt too many innocent people. Now, this matter is between me, the two people I love most -- my wife and our daughter -- and our God. I must put it right, and I am prepared to do whatever it takes to do so. Nothing is more important to me personally. But it is private, and I intend to reclaim my family life for my family. It's nobody's business but ours. Even presidents have private lives.

It is time to stop the pursuit of personal destruction and the prying into private lives and get on with our national life. Our country has been distracted by this matter for too long, and I take my responsibility for my part in all of this. That is all I can do. Now it is time -- in fact, it is past time -- to move on. We have important work to do -- real opportunities to seize, real problems to solve, real security matters to face. And so tonight, I ask you to turn away from the spectacle of the past seven months, to repair the fabric of our national discourse, and to return our attention to all the challenges and all the promise of the next American century. Thank you for watching. And good night."

___________________________________________________________

Hillary sits on the Armed Forces Committee, but she refuses to criticize Durbin's scurrilous attack on the military.

[Mia T]

I can't comment on hillary's sperm supply, but I think killer worker-bee activity has already begun...

"I'm one of the few in the semi-inner circle who [doesn't] think she can win" [the White House].

Harold Ickes
Time, January 2005

GEFFEN UNLOADS ON HILLARY: 'SHE CAN'T WIN'

DRUDGE REPORT
Thu Feb 17 2005 23:13:00 ET

Sen. Hillary Clinton should not count on help from Hollywood mogul David Geffen in her possible run for the White House.

Geffen, who was a generous supporter and pal of Bill Clinton when he was president, trashed Hillary's prospects last night during a Q&A at the 92nd St. Y in New York City.

"She can't win, and she's an incredibly polarizing figure," the billionaire Democrat told his audience. "And ambition is just not a good enough reason."

Lloyd Grove reports in fresh editions of the NY DAILY NEWS the audience broke with "hearty applause" over Geffen's comments.

Developing...

HAROLD ICKES: on winning the presidency by terrorizing white women

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
hillarytalks.blogspot.com
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

coming soon! deletehillary.com
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

"If you look at white women, and I think that was the key to this election, Kerry won 45% based on the exit polls--but they're generally in agreement--Kerry won 45%, Bush won 55% of white women. By contrast, Bush won only 45% of white women in 2000, so he upped is percentages by 10 points. In 1996, bill clinton won 48% of white women compared to Bob Dole's 43%. That is a huge, huge difference. I don't think you can lay all that at the doorstep of moral values. I think that this president unabashedly and abjectly took the issue of terror and used it to terrorize... white women."

HEAR HAROLD ICKES
Washington Journal
Nov. 8, 2004
C-SPAN

 

"Crucial to this protective wall was the secret police, a group of private detectives hired to protect hillary and 'Saturday night bill.' Their tactics included digging up dirt on women who might be linked to bill in order to cow them into silence. There is even some evidence of possible physical intimidation."

HEAR DICK MORRIS

 

Connecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice.

Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators.

Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling:

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

HEAR CHRISTOPHER SHAYS
'Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice'
National Review Online
By NR staff
8/02/2000

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005

[John Lenin]