Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former GOPer Invents Fox News Blocker
NewsMax ^ | 3/25/05 | AP

Posted on 03/25/2005 3:50:21 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

It's not that Sam Kimery objects to the views expressed on Fox News. The creator of the "Fox Blocker" contends that the channel is not news at all.

Kimery figures he's sold about 100 of the little silver bits of metal that screw into the backs of most televisions, allowing people to filter Fox News from their sets, since its August debut.

The Tulsa, Okla., resident also has received thousands of e-mails, both angry and complimentary - as well as a few death threats.

"Apparently the making of terroristic threats against those who don't share your views is a high art form among a certain core audience," said Kimery, 45.

Formerly a registered Republican, even a precinct captain, Kimery became an independent in the 1990s, when he said the state party stopped taking input from its everyday members.

Kimery now contends that Fox News' top-level management dictates a conservative journalistic bias, that inaccuracies are never retracted, and that what winds up on the air is more opinion than news. "I might as well be reading tabloids out of the grocery store," he says. "Anything to get a rise out of the viewer and to reinforce certain retrograde notions."

A Fox spokeswoman at the station's New York headquarters said the channel's ratings speak for themselves. For the first three months of this year, Fox has been averaging 1.62 million viewers in prime time, compared with CNN's 805,000, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Kimery's motives go deeper than preventing people from watching the channel, which he acknowledges can be done without the blocker. But he likens his device to burning a draft card, a tangible example of disagreement.

And he's taking this message to the network's advertisers. After buying the $8.95 device online, would-be blockers are shown a letter that they can send to advertisers via the Fox Blocker site.

"The point is not to block the channel or block free speech but to raise awareness," said Kimery, who works in the tech industry.

Kimery doesn't use the device himself; his remote is programmed to only a half-dozen channels. Plus he occasionally feels the need to tune into Fox News for something "especially heinous."

Business could pick up, since the blocker was alluded to in a recent episode of the ABC drama "Boston Legal." The show's original script mentioned Fox News, but ABC had the references removed.

The boisterous conversations on Fox News may be why the station is so popular, said Matthew Felling, media director for the Center for Media and Public Affairs, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media watchdog group. And despite a perception that Fox leans to the right, Felling said, that doesn't mean people who lean left should tune out.

"It's tough to engage in an argument when you're not participating in it," Felling said. "It's just one more layer in the wall that the right and the left are building in between each other."


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: foxnews; invention; media
Jan 27, 2005 - The Fox Blocker (V Chip for Fox News...BARF ALERT) update.
1 posted on 03/25/2005 3:50:22 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Kimery now contends that Fox News' top-level management dictates a conservative journalistic bias, that inaccuracies are never retracted, and that what winds up on the air is more opinion than news. "I might as well be reading tabloids NYT out of the grocery store," he says.
2 posted on 03/25/2005 3:53:08 PM PST by evolved_rage (A $500 hammer then would require $10,000 of SOX documentation today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Former GOPer Invents Fox News Blocker"

He didn't invent squat; it's called a "trap", sometimes refered to as a filter.

Been used by the CATV industry for years...they buy them by the bucket load for anywhere from a buck twenty-nine to three dollars, depending on the channel.

Former GOPer Invents markets channel blocker to people too stupid to change the channel to eliminate Fox News Blocker and laughs all the way to the bank.

That's better.

3 posted on 03/25/2005 3:59:52 PM PST by 506trooper (No such thing as too much guns, ammo or fuel on board...unless you're on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 506trooper

You beat me to it.

Yeah, and to think all these years I JUST FLIPPED THE CHANNEL!


4 posted on 03/25/2005 4:02:11 PM PST by AZ_Cowboy ("Be ever vigilant, for you know not when the master is coming")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1370835/posts


5 posted on 03/25/2005 4:06:16 PM PST by Netizen (USA - Land of the free, home of the brave, where the handicapped are legally starved and dehydrated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

Too bad there are no freq. (freak?) traps for morons.


6 posted on 03/25/2005 4:07:55 PM PST by xcamel (Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

typical-liberal-headline-grabbing-third-party-solution-circumventing-the-need-for-responsibility-and-action-on-the part-of-the-first-party-alert.


7 posted on 03/25/2005 4:08:29 PM PST by the invisib1e hand ("remember, from ashes you came, to ashes you will return.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 506trooper
Realizing the dwindling audiences of ABS, CBS, NBS, CNBS, PBS...,
  1. Is this being marketed by word of mouth?
  2. If advertised, who is seeing it?
  3. Those who are exposed to the marketing, what value is this product to them?
  4. What objections would FOX have?

8 posted on 03/25/2005 4:09:57 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection (www.whatyoucrave.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AZ_Cowboy

LOL...how can the economy improve if you use common sense instead of buying worthless stuff. 8^)


9 posted on 03/25/2005 4:10:32 PM PST by 506trooper (No such thing as too much guns, ammo or fuel on board...unless you're on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 506trooper

Yeah, what #3 said....

Of course you would have to stock a bunch of different frequencies, since it isn't blocking FOX but the frequency it is being transmitted on, and that varies from locale to locale and cable system to cable system.

And only lazy, ignorant people who value symbolism over substance (in other words, your typical liberal) would buy the silly things. Even my little $60 cheapie TV has provisions for programming out any channel or channels you want.....

I suppose I could program out CNN CBS ABC NBC etc, but if I don't want to watch something, I just move on up or down the "dial".

The guy selling these things is following the old W.C. Fields adage: "Never give a sucker an even break".


10 posted on 03/25/2005 4:17:22 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
1. Is this being marketed by word of mouth?

*shrug*

2. If advertised, who is seeing it?

**shrug* not me

3. Those who are exposed to the marketing, what value is this product to them?

none, unless their remote or off button is broken. Maybe a replacement for a pet rock.

4. What objections would FOX have?

none...the people who would buy this already don't watch FOX at all...repeat at all. If you install one of these, you block the entire channel, not just the news; if you want to see anything on FOX, you'd have to take it off.

Traps were basically used to prevent a subscriber from receiving a pay channel they hadn't payed for, and though still used in some locales, their use has decreased drastically in the last few years.

11 posted on 03/25/2005 4:22:52 PM PST by 506trooper (No such thing as too much guns, ammo or fuel on board...unless you're on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt
"Yeah, what #3 said.... "I was three...*chuckling*...yerp...been in and around the CATV industry since my wife was employed with a MSO in '79....one of my company's products is CATV, although I do mostly technical administration on the Sonet ring and network applications now
12 posted on 03/25/2005 4:30:03 PM PST by 506trooper (No such thing as too much guns, ammo or fuel on board...unless you're on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
Ammunition
13 posted on 03/25/2005 4:32:12 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection (www.whatyoucrave.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 506trooper

My point is, just like normal liberal "logic", who besides them cares? The hole since 1994 continues to get deeper.


14 posted on 03/25/2005 4:36:29 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection (www.whatyoucrave.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Oh, great... Now the "inventor" is claiming that he is getting death threats.....

Every neo or paleo leftist that wants publicity these days is claiming death threats from conservatives.

Ludicrous on the face of it.

I thought this guy might be just an entrepreneur taking advantage of the ignorance of liberals, but with this claim, he officially joins hillary, kerry and the other kool aid servers and drinkers IMO.


15 posted on 03/25/2005 4:42:02 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt

Deaath threats? What about those people in Waco?


16 posted on 03/25/2005 4:49:24 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection (www.whatyoucrave.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Got it.


17 posted on 03/25/2005 4:49:42 PM PST by 506trooper (No such thing as too much guns, ammo or fuel on board...unless you're on fire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Huh? I was just referring to one of the articles from your link: http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles

Maybe I missed something , but the only Waco death threats I can think of is what Janet Reno and Wes Clark actually caried out.

18 posted on 03/25/2005 5:51:02 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Like putting blinders on a horse. Keep him focused on what you want him to see and not what is going on around him. Thus, the term - narrow minded.


19 posted on 03/27/2005 5:52:48 AM PST by rupeskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rupeskid

Good post Bro! It's about time you stopped lurking... :-)


20 posted on 03/27/2005 7:39:21 AM PST by DanTheAdmin (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson