Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GopherIt
You really should make it clear that you are exerpting from a polemic by Dr. Cranford that appeared on a blog. Us physicians on one side of opinion (ditzy "vitalists") are readily discredited, but Hemlockers are always objective, right?

I usually provide links to my excerpts so the interested reader can discover the source. In this case the link is there for the clicking. The information supporting Terri's wishes comes from "Hemlockers," is that the new name? You'll notice that the Terribots post a ton of opposing information from terrisfight.org, which can hardly be considered an impartial source. The only source I've seen that even comes close to objectivity is the Abstract Appeal website. And even using that information, I've had people tell me that the author "enjoys seeing Terri suffer" or some such thing.

So I suppose no matter who posts what information, the other side will always try to debunk it. Or obfuscate.

109 posted on 03/23/2005 7:59:49 AM PST by Tarantulas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Tarantulas

>So I suppose no matter who posts what information, the other side will always try to debunk it. Or obfuscate.


Well, you're right about that.

Vitalist (per Dr. Cranford); hmmm, I do like the sound of that.


112 posted on 03/23/2005 8:04:41 AM PST by GopherIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson