Boxer Busted on Iraq Lie During Condi Confirmation Hearings

www.crushkerry.com (soon to be www.anklebitingpundits.com) ^ | 1/19/05 | www.crushkerry.com (soon to be www.anklebitingpundits.com)

[vbmoneyspender]

They're especially dangerous when those missles have the capacity to strike you.

You mean like our pilots who were routinely being fired at by Hussein?

Here's my problem -- I simply cannot understand your mindset. We know, because bin Laden has told us so, that 9/11 resulted from bin Laden believing (with good cause after Somalia, the U.S.S. Cole, the Khobar Tower bombings and the embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzinia) that he could directly attack us and we would not respond. As a result, 3,000 people died because some lunatic believed we were weak and didn't have the will to go after him even though he was routinely killing our fellow citiznes. Notwithstanding that clear history, you wanted to repeat almost the exact same scenario with Hussein by not responding when he was attacking our pilots. Perhaps you can explain to me how that 'turn the other cheek' approach would have been rational after of 9/11?

[OldFriend]

They are divorced and Tony Rodham, the reprobate, has custody of their son.

Notice how the media protects the privacy of the left but felt free to demand the records of Ryan of Illinois.

[trisham]

That it's the Bush doctrine is fine - but don't pretend it has any basis in international law or deserves to be respected as such.

**************

No?

[OldFriend]

This morning Boxer is contradicting her self......and making a bigger ass of herself if possible.

Biden demands that Condi promise to find common ground with our 'enemies' and then Boxer attacks Rumsfeld for meeting with Saddam Hussein during the Iraq/Iran war.

Michael Moore is clearly writing Boxer's material.

[OldFriend]

I doubt that Boxer will vote to confirm Dr. Rice.

Michael Moore would not allow that.

[vbmoneyspender]

However, based on the continuing U.S. flights and the diplomatic track record of attempting to stop it, legally I can find nothing to fault Iraq for firing on U.S. planes.

No offense meant, but if you believe that Hussein was legally entitled to fire on our pilots you are traitorous scum.

[cousair]

The DNC keeps wondering why they have been defeated an defeated and defeated??! One only needs to watch the Senate today at Dr. Rice's hearings. Boxer acts like the hatchet girl for Hitler and seems to love what she is doing. All Americans are watching her and understand she represents the Democrats. If they want to be re elected, this most certainly IS NOT THE WAY TO DO IT. Boxer is rude, obnoxious and intent on impuning the intregrity of Dr. Rice, President Bush and the people of the United States. We are not stupid Senator Boxer, we are watching your performance and even though you have just been re elected by California, a lot of what is left of the Democratic Party has not. Beware a loss of MORE seats the next time around. America has had enough of this kind of slander.

[vbmoneyspender]

Anyone who picks Hussein over our pilots by saying that Hussein was legally entitled to fire missiles at them is traitorous scum. Again, no offense meant, but why is that difficult for you to understand. Hussein was attacking our people and you are saying he was right to do so. What should one label that other than treason.

[Coldwater Creek]

Thanks, somehow I missed the news.

[Coldwater Creek]

What an idiot!!

[TigersEye]

BOXER: Well, you should read what we voted on when we voted to support the war, which I did not, but most of my colleagues did. It was WMD, period. That was the reason and the causation for that, you know, particular vote.

When I heard this I thought Dr. Rice should have politely but firmly said "If that's the case, Senator, please produce the text of that so that we may all profit by publicly airing the document that lead a nation to war for one reason only. I have never seen such a document and would be very interested to read it and know why and how I missed it. It should be very instructive to this body who found it compelling enough to overwhelmingly vote for it."

[hawkaw]

Thank you for this piece.

This was outstanding research!

This resolution is something that nerver makes it into the press. All I keep hearing from the MSM (including Fox) is no WMDs (even though WMDs were found but then due to goal post moving it became "no stockpiles").

Your research does not seem to ever be echoed "loudly" enough by those who support Bush43 in this effort (other than here at FR). I hope in the future that people like Rush et. al. repeat this outstanding research over and over again so that the MSM and the radical left does not change the true history of events.

Thanks again!

[vbmoneyspender]

When you support someone who is trying to kill our people, you are committing an act of disloyaty, otherwise known as treason. When you are concocting legal arguments that support a thug like Hussein who is attacking our troops, you are being disloyal, otherwise known as being traitorous. Why are those concepts so difficult for people on the hard left to understand.

[shield]

Thanks for carefully pointing out boxer's lying lips. Great post. The RATS continue with this crapola: LYING LIPS...if their lips are moving you know they're lying. Boxer just isn't any different at all. Birds of the same feather appear to flock together.

Scriptures teach us....they'd be a day when GOOD would be called evil and evil would be called GOOD. Appears we've arrived at that day.

[crushkerry]

Thanks. The research took all of 5 minutes. No wonder the MSM is falling way behind.