>
There's your answer, Owen. You fell for a hoax.
>
It's looking possible. This stuff is from Jackson's staff and they may have been fed bad numbers. I'm seeing some evidence that the numbers are not correct even in raw form.
It seemed wise to get the data presented so rebuttals could be formed ASAP.
This is Jesse Jackson we're talking about?
Jesse Jackson is a liar and a fool. If Jesse Jackson is involved in the distribution of information, that information may always safely be ignored.