This would explain in part the sometimes extremely lopsided (and skewed) results that come out of predominately "black" precincts. In all these years, the Americans of African descent don't realize WHO is giving them the shaft? That's right, probably a larger portion of their vote is given to Republican candidates than shows up on the "official" count, because the much higher rate of "spoiled" ballots that just happen to be marked in the Republican column.
This is very interesting indeed! It supports my contention that the shocking success of the Republicans in Georgia last election was much more than it seemed. I'm convinced that the state's switchover to 100% computer voting machines denied the Dems their main tool for manipulating results thus insuring the fair and proper tallying of votes.
Enterprising news sevices were actually able to digitally photograph the posted results at each precint moments after the polls closed. They then tallied and broadcast the results hours before the "official" results were announced. It would have been extremely hard to pull the hanky-panky that some precincts are traditionally noted for here.
Despite all the money spent by the state with the stated goal of preventing another 2000-style debacle and despite the fact that all the changes were administered by the previous democrat regime, the dems are still squealing like stuck pigs because of their losses. Oh, the irony of unintended consequences.