Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
Exactly my point. The frame of reference is relative. All are just as valid as any other.

From here:

http://www.nps.gov/flfo/High%20School%20Curiculum/web%20graphics/Intro.htm

"As with all scientific knowledge, a theory can be refined or even replaced by analternative theory in light of new and compelling evidence.

The geocentric theory that the sun revolves around the earth was replaced by the heliocentric theory of the earth's rotation on its axis and revolution around the sun. However, ideas are not referred to as "theories" in science unless they are supported by bodies of evidence that make their subsequent abandonment very unlikely. When a theory is supported by as much evidence as evolution, it is held with a very high degree of confidence.

In science, the word "hypothesis" conveys the tentativeness inherent in the common use of the word "theory.' A hypothesis is a testable statement about the natural world. Through experiment and observation, hypotheses can be supported or rejected. At the earliest level of understanding, hypotheses can be used to construct more complex inferences and explanations. Like "theory," the word "fact" has a different meaning in science than it does in common usage. A scientific fact is an observation that has been confirmed over and over. However, observations are gathered by our senses, which can never be trusted entirely. Observations also can change with better technologies or with better ways of looking at data. For example, it was held as a scientific fact for many years that human cells have 24 pairs of chromosomes, until improved techniques of microscopy revealed that they actually have 23. Ironically, facts in science often are more susceptible to change than theories, which is one reasonwhy the word "fact" is not much used in science.

Finally, "laws" in science are typically descriptions of how the physical world behaves under certain circumstances. For example, the laws of motion describe how objects move when subjected to certain forces. These laws can be very useful in supporting hypotheses and theories, but like all elements of science they can be altered with new information and observations."

2,485 posted on 08/11/2003 10:29:18 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2483 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer; gore3000
"As with all scientific knowledge, a theory can be refined or even replaced by analternative theory in light of new and compelling evidence.

I like that, RA. Good find.

The opposing view is given by Dickens' Mr. Thomas Gradgrind:

"Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!"

2,489 posted on 08/12/2003 12:23:45 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2485 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson