Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000; Stultis
You deny heliocentrism? On what basis? What is the alternative? Geocentrism has certainly been proven false.

That is not quite the case. You can use the Earth as your frame of reference. In fact, one of my orbit classes at NASA did exactly that. We used the Earth as a frame of reference instead of the sun when we described the celestial sphere. (It described the Sun orbiting the Earth in that reference frame.)

2,427 posted on 08/10/2003 9:00:53 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2425 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer
In fact, one of my orbit classes at NASA did exactly that. We used the Earth as a frame of reference instead of the sun when we described the celestial sphere. (It described the Sun orbiting the Earth in that reference frame.)

That would be a good exercise to see what people know, but I doubt that the Geocentric side won the discussion. You might have gotten away with it in the time of Corpernicus or Galileo, but not today for several reasons. One is that a Geocentric theory requires epicicles, and we know they do not occur. Another is that we are now able to observe the motions of the planets from a different frame of reference than Earth and that gives certain proof of the Heliocentric theory.

2,468 posted on 08/11/2003 7:20:31 PM PDT by gore3000 (Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson