If she had used you as an example in the same way, you would not be saying the above.
I note that she did not treat anyone from the evolutuionist side as an example of what should not be done, so her statement was definitely not fair.
Seems to me also, that you should be asking her to call her post a mistake (preferably by Freepmail - as the posts made by the three of you should have been addressed) instead of excusing it. Civility goes two ways, not one.
Indeed I would be saying the exact same thing. See here post #268 "Heck I sure have made my doozies on this website. I am glad when they are pointed out. Again it is good for me (I learn) and it is good for the lurkers, they don't go away with bogus info I posted in error."
I note that she did not treat anyone from the evolutuionist side as an example of what should not be done, so her statement was definitely not fair.
This is also not the case:
"VadeRetro: Now, you've got a great sense of humor and your scientific knowledge is impleccable. But, you've been letting ALS get to you way too much. Lurking on other threads, I saw at least one thread completely unrelated to science where you and ALS engaged in fistcuffs."
Seems to me also, that you should be asking her to call her post a mistake (preferably by Freepmail - as the posts made by the three of you should have been addressed) instead of excusing it. Civility goes two ways, not one.</font.
I did not consider her post a mistake. (I am also fully aware that our exchange she was referring to was in the past). My thoughts on this is she is reminding both you and the rest of us that it's ok to admit an error.
I still wish you would drop this.