Posted on 11/14/2002 11:56:40 AM PST by xzins
You don't know Jean personally then.
That is found here: click here
Now, how did you manage to ignore leaving that out of your post? Easy. You misrepresent, dissemble, prevaricate....you lie.
Doc said he threatened him. I don't need to know anything else. Only whacko's think they need to threaten someone in a personal email on a public bulletin board/forum.
I deliberately left that sentence out and told my sister (who is visiting here and reading this thread) to watch you take that bait like I knew you would. Hahahahaha.
That sentence didn't change the meaning of what the_doc wrote at all in context. But you snatched it out of context and used it as a stand alone in your post so as to accuse him.
Thanks for providing even more evidence of your malicious agenda, xzins.
You are one transparent dude.
I don't think he loves me a whole lot.
Hmmmm.....
Doc said he threatened him.
You don't threaten people on a bulletin board because you disagree with them. Get it.
I wasn't even trying to get you to fall for anything, and you're warped enough to fall into the manure pile all on your own.
It's too easy to unravel your absurdities. You should go back to your girlie-man rants. AT least then everyone was entertained.
Doc said he threatened him. I don't need to know anything else. Only whacko's think they need to threaten someone in a personal email on a public bulletin board/forum.
A proven pattern of abuse and threatening. See my profile page for additional proof of his abusive and threatening use of Free Republic communication.
The BIG QUESTION:
Why is a man, the_doc, who has publicly admitted to employing personal threats and abuse on this Forum, still permitted to utilize this Forum?
I would take it as a badge of honor. If he loved me, I'd figure I was slipping.
That's the way Rush Limbaugh feels about the Marxist Left DemocRATS who hate him.
It's like he says of those who attack him, "If I wasn't an EFFECTIVE threat to their agenda, they wouldn't even pay attention to me." Hahahahaha
Threats, threats. Thats all you make. Why haven't you done it?
Instead, just the opposite has happened. I have a record of all of it on my own personal PC, too.
Keep calling in all those other emotional basket-cases to help you in your attacks. Apparently you must think that if you can call in enough of them that they can pull you up out of your hole.
Trouble is .... most of them have dug their own deep holes so keep looking ... you might find one that hasn't, yet.
Speaking of. HAHAHAHAHAHA
Re: The True Eucharist
From the_doc | 2002-04-28 14:16:12 replied
The reason why I posted on the Eucharist thread was to address you in particular. I know that you are not a true Christian and that you are "trying" to be one.
Unfortunately, you are not going about it correctly. You are repeating the mistake I once made. The fact is, you are not even trying to be a **Christian.** You are trying to be a Papist. That really is different.
Today's Papacy is a fraud, Brian. You have been badly suckered. And yes, I say that you were before of old ordained to this condemnation (Jude 4). Augustine himself really **would** denounce you if he were alive in our day--and this despite the fact that he was devoted to the idea of the Papacy in his own day (even though Augustine specifically attacked the notion that the Church of Rome was founded on Peter).
Augustine never realized where his own wrongheaded endorsement of the Papacy was headed. But by the 16th century, it was obvious to spiritually sane people that the Papists had become a bunch of murdering, crooked swine, not Christians.
Your "church" is foul, Brian. It is one of the most morally corrupt entities in Christendom. Some Christians regard Romanism as profoundly embarrassing to Christianity. But I certainly don't. The fact is, Papism is obviously not Christian. It is antichristian.
In other words, you have chosen a false gospel. That's why I decided to make one last appeal to you based on your distinctive (and screwy) doctrine of "transubstantiation."
This is why I dare to tell you that I regard you as a silly cannibal, not a real Christian.
My point, Brian, is that your overall theology is making a fool out of you--i.e., revealing that you are anything **but** a Christian. You need to start noticing this. Being a stubbornly superstitious religious dork does not make you wonderfully spiritual. It just makes you a stubbornly superstitious religious dork.
You are a disgrace to your profession, of course.
Please don't assume that I get a kick out of saying this. Heck, our roles could easily have been reversed. I don't look down on you. You even seem like a bright, interesting fellow. But being bright and interesting count for nothing at all with the God of the Bible. You are hereby warned, Brian.
Unfortunately, you don’t like unctuous, clear warnings. I realize that. In fact, you lovely RCs got OP banned for stating **your own doctrine** of the Eucharist in completely **clear** terms. You RCs were profoundly **embarrassed** to hear it stated so clearly. You were speechless when he demonstrated that your supposedly sublime, supposedly lovely doctrine of the Eucharist is actually quite ABSURD and quite MONSTROUS. Ah, but your demonic controller will never let you be reasonable about this stuff. When you start to lose an argument with a Protestant, you try to **silence** him.
You spiritual idiots would rather go to hell than to admit that a Protestant is right in CONDEMNING your ASININE doctrine of the Eucharist. You would rather whine that we don't understand the Eucharist. But we do understand it. We understand from your doctrine that you are idiots and cannibals to boot. We understand that you are spiritually worthless cowards for failing to rise up against Rome and its filthy superstitions. We understand that you are spiritually worthless cowards by conspiring to suppress someone who has the guts which you lack.
What you are doing in your agitation, of course, is simply blaming us Protestants for your own RCC's stupidity. And you do this over and over and over. When we Protestants **point** out that your silly and flagrantly unscriptural priesthood is overrun with filthy little queers, you want to kill us for telling you the **Truth.** You can't stand the Truth. Rather than face the Truth, you try to kill the Truth-teller.
Hey, it has happened before. The Lord Jesus, the Truth Incarnate, was killed by reprobate religionists aligned with Rome, of course. And it is inarguably **true** that the RCC has murdered MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of Christians. What else should we expect from cannibals?
Do you see the pattern? Cannibals, cowards, liars, queers, murderers. It really is the stuff in the Book of Revelations. The RCC really is a Whore of Babylon, of Judaizing Apostasy, sitting on a City of Seven Hills.
And I happen to be a saint. Already. It is quite literally the greatest thing in the world. On the other hand, you are--to put it bluntly--Satanically screwed. The saddest thing about this is that it's your own fault.
If you will abandon Rome, I will joyfully receive you as a brother. Failing that, you will stumble and fall right into the hell from which there is no escape--**ever.** Take your choice. Either way, on Judgment Day, I win.
From the_doc
Top of Page
I won't answer that. I'm not yet ready to leave this forum permanently.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.