[KentuckyWoman]

Total BS.

Oh REALLY? Then kindly explain to me why so many posters (many of which had been posting here a LONG time and were well thought of) have been banned during the last few months for nothing more than posting something that questioned something the current administration is doing? I didn't like those in DC ignoring and rewriting the Constitution to suit their own purposes and visions when the Dems were in the white house and I'm not hypocritial enough to tolerate the same things just because the Republicans are doing it now.

[Howlin]

Then kindly explain to me why so many posters (many of which had been posting here a LONG time and were well thought of) have been banned during the last few months for nothing more than posting something that questioned something the current administration is doing?

You'll have to take that up with Jim Robinson.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

Why not comment on the "facts" and "truth" in the article?

You are commenting on this poster being banned and blaming FR for not supporting garbage being posted.

You really believe this trash?

[VaBthang4]

"Oh REALLY? Then kindly explain to me why so many posters (many of which had been posting here a LONG time and were well thought of) have been banned during the last few months for nothing more than posting something that questioned something the current administration is doing?"

Obviously House cleaning...

During every administration be it Liberal or Conservative you are going to get your idological opposition but you will also get contrarians who rail against everything.

FreeRepublic became a famous place to come and discuss your oppostion to what was happening in our government. Now that Conservatives have taken back the White House...you are starting to see who the Conservatives are....and who were the sycophant contrarians.

Contrarian and Conservative arent one and the same.

Conservatives can stay.....Contrarians gotta go.

IMHO

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Then kindly explain to me why so many posters (many of which had been posting here a LONG time and were well thought of) have been banned during the last few months for nothing more than posting something that questioned something the current administration is doing?

Who has this happened to? Seriously. Are you absolutely sure that was the reason?

I honestly do not believe that someone would be banned for merely posting an article from World Net Daily. There has to be more to it than that.

[justshe]

JimRob's words:

Here

Sheesh, why don't they just change the channel? Listen, you're all missing the point. I don't allow liberals on this website because I do not want to be responsible for pushing their marxist anti-American, anti-Freedom, anti-God political agenda. And I do not allow strings of profanity laden posts here or vulgarity or pornogaraphy because I do not want to promote that sort of trash. And I do not like religion bashing here because I do not agree with bashing or persecuting people because of their religious beliefs. And I do not like people ripping each others throats out on my website so I rule that out. And I do not like people advancing marxist/leftist/socialist/liberal agenda on my property so I rule out the marxist propagandists and tin-foil hat stuff. It's not that I care whether or not anyone reads this stuff (or have the right to say it), I just do not want to be responsible for promoting it. If others want to promote that garbage, then they should do it from their own websites. Free Speech Rules!! Freedom Rocks!!

362 posted on 8/28/02 7:45 PM Pacific by Jim Robinson

AND Here

You're making this way too complicated. Of course we post stuff to criticise or expose it. But when people post propaganda to smear our own candidates or causes, then that's something else. I hate what the leftists are doing to this country and I oppose their steady erosion of our Constitutional rights and of the Constitution itself, therefore I want to promote voting them out of office. This website was not named Free Republic by chance. Had I wanted to allow equal time or debating rights to liberals/marxist/propagandists, et al, I would've named it Socialist-Marxist-Debating.Society.com or perhaps DemocraticSocietyRUS.com.

363 posted on 8/28/02 8:08 PM Pacific by Jim Robinson

[ravingnutter]

Yes, oh really...Sen. Joe Biden, a Democrat, submitted the proposal for the PCA amendment...the Bush Administration, including Rumsfeld and Tom Ridge are against it. Click here for my response on another thread. Bush merely asked for a review of the law based on Biden's proposal.