Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Anti-feminist' female influencer sparks FURY after arguing that divorce should be ILLEGAL - and insisting that women shouldn't have the right to VOTE because they can't be drafted
daily mail ^

Posted on 06/16/2023 7:26:19 PM PDT by algore

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 06/16/2023 7:26:19 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: algore

common sense 100 years ago. Now it is nearly illegal to say these things.

I wonder how much damage to society was caused by the birth control pill.


2 posted on 06/16/2023 7:29:54 PM PDT by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

While it might be a bit of a stretch to say that divorce should be illegal, it IS true that no-fault divorce has ruined America.

It allows the woman to cheat and be rewarded with custody, half of everything and a fat child support stipend. It’s insane.

I will never remarry, and when my son comes of age I will advise him not to do the same. It’s just too risky.


3 posted on 06/16/2023 7:34:43 PM PDT by DarrellZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imabadboy99

“common sense 100 years ago”

Yup ...I like her.

the problem with common sense is... it’s not very common.


4 posted on 06/16/2023 7:35:22 PM PDT by 1of10 (be vigilant , be strong, be safe, be 1 of 10 .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: imabadboy99

Lots to both women and men

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/health/article-11450967/Does-pill-change-youre-attracted-Woman-lesbian-coming-pill.html

I have read lots of papers about how women on the pill prefer a different kind of man when pilled. They go off it get pregnant and hate everything about him


5 posted on 06/16/2023 7:36:21 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: algore

Wow. They are so easy to troll. I guess it’s fair to call her anti-feminist, she hits them pretty hard. She is six feet tall, and plays semi-professional basketball.


6 posted on 06/16/2023 7:36:27 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Wow. They are so easy to troll. I guess it’s fair to call her anti-feminist, she hits them pretty hard. She is six feet tall, and plays semi-professional basketball.


7 posted on 06/16/2023 7:36:33 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

If you looks st the facts. Andrew Tate is more anti-male than misogynist.


8 posted on 06/16/2023 7:37:27 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

The number of lies an article contains is directly proportional to the number of adjectives.


9 posted on 06/16/2023 7:43:42 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is ████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

I’m with Hannah Pearl Davis on this one.


10 posted on 06/16/2023 7:51:32 PM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1of10

Indeed.


11 posted on 06/16/2023 7:55:02 PM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: imabadboy99

“common sense 100 years ago. Now it is nearly illegal to say these things.”

Yep, even Reagan had to put Sandra D. on the Supreme Court, costing our side NUMEROUS cases...and it was only because he needed the woman’s vote.

An HONEST female conservative would GLADLY give up her vote if it meant that women would no longer be allowed to vote. A female conservative who would not do that, is a person who puts her tribe first, not the country.


12 posted on 06/16/2023 7:59:23 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: algore

pretty close to N.T. Biblical divorce (or ban on divorce for the purposes of marrying someone else).

woman has a good head on her shoulders.


13 posted on 06/16/2023 8:00:53 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

She has the right to choose not to vote for herself. She does not have the right to force that choice on the rest of us. And even in today’s world there’s nothing stopping her from finding a breadwinner husband and becoming a SAHM if that’s what she wants to do. Nothing except feminist disapproval, that is, and real conservatives don’t care what the left thinks of them anymore than they favor using the heavy hand of government to force their life choices on others.

As for divorce I don’t think it’s a good thing but there are cases where it’s justified (abuse, adultery, etc.). A blanket ban is too extreme.


14 posted on 06/16/2023 8:14:12 PM PDT by FormerFRLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

“women shouldn’t have the right to VOTE because they can’t be drafted”

Ridiculous.

Women shouldn’t have the vote because they vote for false promises of safety over liberty, and for free stuff from the daddy state rather than free enterprise.

To be fair, not bad for a girl though. At least she’s right, even if for the wrong reason.


15 posted on 06/16/2023 8:35:49 PM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Women have a lot of wonderful qualities, but being good leaders or choosing good leaders is not their forte. They let their emotions make decisions.

The Thatchers and Golda Meir are few and far between.

The 19th amendment wasn’t such a good idea.


16 posted on 06/16/2023 8:36:16 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

17 posted on 06/16/2023 8:44:00 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: algore

Also, property owners, that means people with something to lose, were the only ones who could vote as well.

There was a very good reason behind it. But feelings and what is fair ended that practice.


18 posted on 06/16/2023 9:04:16 PM PDT by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton William Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wildbill22
Also, property owners, that means people with something to lose, were the only ones who could vote as well.

Members of The Militia could also vote. Don't forget them.

19 posted on 06/16/2023 11:29:36 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FormerFRLurker

Her not voting doesn’t offset the choices women are making as voters which she disagrees with. You are suggesting women should be voters but not subject to a draft. That’s not equality. She also understands exceptions for divorce but it’s too easy to quit a marriage rather than work on the marriage.


20 posted on 06/17/2023 1:50:57 AM PDT by newzjunkey (We need a better Trump than Trump in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson