Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem: Cohen filing means Trump committed two felonies
The Hill ^ | December 7, 2018 | Chris Mills Rodrigo

Posted on 12/08/2018 3:58:16 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) argued Friday that federal prosecutors' latest filing in a case involving President Trump's former longtime attorney Michael Cohen means that Trump allegedly committed two felonies.

Lieu, a member of the House Judiciary Committee and frequent Trump critic, told MSNBC's Chris Matthews on "Hardball" that "we have a sitting president of the United States who committed two felonies while running for president.”....

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: blackmail; cohen; democrats; felonies; feloniestalkingpoint; plalieu; plaofficerted; plateddy; tedlieu; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: Wayne07

I strongly disagree that paying off a trollop counts as a campaign contribution.


61 posted on 12/08/2018 5:07:56 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: piasa; Regulator

He’s most likely PLA under not-very-deep cover...


62 posted on 12/08/2018 5:08:45 PM PST by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ted Lou is an idiot


63 posted on 12/08/2018 5:11:19 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

They have always had the votes, Bolshies and never-Trumpers would have been enough votes, but, they never had 67 votes in the Senate. They could have wasted time and got the same President, who, does not forget a thing.


64 posted on 12/08/2018 5:14:34 PM PST by depressed in 06 (60 in '20.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Skywise
"I strongly disagree that paying off a trollop counts as a campaign contribution."

It isn't inherently, which is why if Trump paid it himself there would be no issue. But when someone from your campaign pays off the trollop, and that person raises money from a third party to pay off another trollop, then you are likely into a campaign contribution violation. Is it impeachable? Not at all.

65 posted on 12/08/2018 5:20:57 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
"Stare decisis, right?"

I'm no lawyer or law student, but from what I understand, Edwards was charged with six felony counts by the Feds.

Wikipedia quote: "On May 31, 2012, Edwards was found not guilty on Count 3, illegal use of campaign funding (contributions from Rachel "Bunny" Mellon), while mistrials were declared on all other counts against him. On June 13, 2012, the Justice Department announced that it dropped the charges and would not attempt to retry Edwards."

Count 3 had to do with using campaign donations as "hush money." The FEC claimed back in 2011, that the Edwards Campaign owed approximately $2 million dollars his campaign had received in matching funds. The FEC said that the matching funds payment was based on bad figures provided by the campaign. I have not found anything that would attest to the campaign ever paying the fine.

Obviously John Edwards never disclosed these campaign fund payments to the FEC. And as far as I know, Edwards wasn't fined by the FEC for the "hush money" payment. The fact that Trump reimbursed his lawyer out of his own pocket, has nothing to do with campaign law. That's why it's so outrageous that Cohen agreed to plead guilty to a law that doesn't even exist. I think Cohen believed if he pled to that made-up charge, it would get him a lighter sentence. The fact that Mueller has asked the court to sentence him to 4 years, tells me that Cohen never delivered the info on Trump that he promised. I saw an article earlier today on The Liberty Daily where Alan Dershowitz said basically the same thing. I think Mueller's sentencing request is all about revenge on Cohen for not giving Mueller what he wanted.

66 posted on 12/08/2018 5:23:47 PM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“A candidate is forbidden from spending campaign money for personal purposes, but he can spend his own money to do so, and it is perfectly legal. “

You are right, but Trump didn’t spend his own money. Cohen used a home equity loan to make one payment, and then got money from AMI (National Enquirer) for the other.


67 posted on 12/08/2018 5:27:52 PM PST by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: All

They are going to impeach bet the farm. This would be a good time to finally go on offense President Trump and l don’t mean tweets.


68 posted on 12/08/2018 5:30:50 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All

And another question is: will the GOP finally defend the President or stand by while the Rats and MSM continue to shove knives into Trump?


69 posted on 12/08/2018 5:40:17 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Haha haha. They have already taken “America”. We are in the death throws. We elected the President and they didn’t like our choice......it has been non stop attack on WE the American people, not Donal trump, but WE the people. Frankly, I haven’t seen any fight back and we never will.


70 posted on 12/08/2018 5:48:20 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There were people back in the Clinton years who said the democrats may one day regret standing by Bill Clinton. I think this is the time. IF, AND THAT’S A BIG IF, there are any republicans who have grown any.

The problem is all the republicans KNOW the DS will make them disappear while Trump will only slap them on the risk and say “I need some help.” I’d bet most of them will cower and do what the DS tells them to do. Very sad.


71 posted on 12/08/2018 5:51:14 PM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

” I think Mueller’s sentencing request is all about revenge on Cohen”

Clearly.

But it was probably a double cross from the start. Mueller knows it’s a big stretch to make a private matter a “campaign finance violation”, but that’s the problem with what he’s doing: he extorted a vulnerable victim and he never planned to give the guy a break.


72 posted on 12/08/2018 6:13:32 PM PST by Regulator (LOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Spok

So spending money on a pack of iies called a “dossier” to influence an election is ok?


73 posted on 12/08/2018 6:16:55 PM PST by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

I’m very sick of our two party system because in effect they are a bought and paid for one party. And they work for those who paid and it isn’t We The People they give a $hit about.

I just don’t know how we can replace our system...and they’ve dumbed down and bribed the voters with out tax money to the point we can’t rely on voting them out.

Trump is our best and probably our only shot.


74 posted on 12/08/2018 6:22:48 PM PST by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The person giving the money is acting under duress. The person taking the money is the key operator. It’s called blackmail.


75 posted on 12/08/2018 6:29:02 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is simply not true. But here is the Dems impeachment scenario.


76 posted on 12/08/2018 6:38:04 PM PST by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bull. They made up a fake charge to a non-crime that Cohen pleaded guilty to in plea deal. Trump did nothing illegal.


77 posted on 12/08/2018 6:40:03 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Influencing an election” that sure covers a lot of ground-in fact as much ground as prosecutors think it should cover. Now the common sense interpretation would be money used directly to influence voters as in campaign ads, mail outs, and rallies. Since it is difficult to show that a NDA which was not known by the voters could have swayed their decision and influenced their vote. So just who did the agreement influence? The only people it influenced would be the people directly parties to that agreement.


78 posted on 12/08/2018 6:58:14 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The minute the gavel drops for the next congressional session in January. The Republicans need to call a vote immediately to impeach the president. That should be the very first vote. Don’t let the Democrats drag this out for months or longer. Get it to the Senate where it will not pass. Heck, it may not even pass in the house, but get it out of the way. Don’t let the Democrat control this.


79 posted on 12/08/2018 7:12:56 PM PST by political1 (Love your neighbors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

Actually it is - if they decide that all of that is a felony - It’s disqualification for holding the office of president.


80 posted on 12/08/2018 7:13:19 PM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson