So tell me, why did you do that? What are you?
Posted on 03/08/2014 6:07:03 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome
So when did Ann's and Obama Sr.'s "whatever happened happened fast" wedding happen? For no apparent reason, confusion abounds among Obama's biographers over the wedding date:
1. Dreams claims that Ann and Obama Sr. were in married "in 1960"; similarly, Mendell's 2007 book claims that the couple were married "sometime in late 1960" when they "slipped off alone to the island of Maui"; and both Obamaland (2008) by Ron Jacobs (with contributor David Maraniss) and a 2007 Washington Post article claim that the two were married "late in 1960."
2. A 2007 Chicago Tribune article vaguely claims that Ann and Obama Sr. were married "six months before" Barack's birth on Aug 4, 1961 -- or, in other words, sometime in early 1961.
3. An April 2008 Time article by Amanda Ripley, as does Maraniss's August 2008 article, gives a specific date of February 2, 1961 for the wedding, apparently based on Ann's and Obama Sr.'s 1964 divorce records – mysteriously appearing on the web. But since fake documents have been known to appear on the web, Obama's biographers, Ripley and Maraniss, might want to verify the 1964 divorce documents – especially since a Feb. 2, 1961 marriage date for "Ann and Obama Sr." wasn't reported in any Honolulu Advertiser or Honolulu Star-Bulletin marriage lists from February 1961. Take the February 8, 1961 Star-Bulletin, which listed eighteen marriages from Feb. 3, Feb. 4, and Feb. 6, and no Feb. 2 marriages, and the February 7, 1961 Advertiser, which listed eleven marriages from Feb. 2 to 4, including two Feb. 2 marriages.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
More to the point, considering you've spent quite some time on the subject, what is your opinion, and do you actually have one?
So tell me, why did you do that? What are you?
And when I wrote ‘concentrate on Stanley Ann Dunham’s teeth’ that was meant as SARCASM.
Because while you are looking at her teeth, the communist cabal from Chicago gets a pass.
Of course they don't, but did you notice just down the page a little, up jumps a supporter of the fraud Joel Gilbert - with an image of the two women with their teeth circled in red. Never mind that the model had a crossed front tooth, and was quite obviously a lot older in 1958. That doesn't show up on the Gilbert image. But it's good enough for some people. Which makes me wonder at their motive, and what they are doing here.
Yes, I did notice that. I had read years ago that the woman in the compromising images was not Stanley Ann Dunham, and so why this issue persists is a mystery to me, but these things seem to happen.
Davis and the Committee for Protection of Foreign Born
One of the longest lived Communist Party USA fronts was the American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born . Active from 1935 until 1980, the ACFPFB was charged with preventing foreign born communists such Davis’s friend ILWU leader Harry Bridges from deportation.
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Frank_Marshall_Davis
..............
This is the first time I’ve seen this.
It would suggest—as you do— that Obama could have anybody for a father and mother.
We’ll have to dub yours the Maltese Falcon theory.
I had attributed the document fudging to the CIA because of FR threads on Obama’s grandparents.
What we know is that the narrative from the beginning has been one long fairy tale that gets changed every decade or so.
It isn’t ‘my theory’ and it doesn’t need a name, thank you.
I see this discussion as a serious issue, and not some draft for a novel or a film. This is real life and real people who will suffer. Not a Hollywood blockbuster.
I’ve never involved myself in this dialogue because the evidence is spotty. We are six years into it, and the damage is being done. More important, imho, is that our Constitution is ignored, that our liberties are compromised, and that our commander in chief is an abject coward.
The model’s front teeth had an overlap. Stanley Ann’s do not. Plus the chin is entirely different.
Are you invested in the “exotic model is SAD” fake theory for some reason?
That's simply evidence of how one lie leads to another. The original deception gave the child an ID which belonged to another. It was never meant to be permanent imo, he was meant to be brought up in Indonesia. Why he was returned to Hawaii on his own and why his name was changed on the passport application in August 1968, is obviously connected to the change in the political situation in Indonesia. Sukarno being deposed would not have been anticipated in the early sixties when that child was taken to live in the palace in Jakarta.
If you had read the research threads since summer 2008 as I have, you’d see that the comments by some people on the topic have weight and evidence behind them, and many do not. Fred Nerks’ comments have evidence and weight. The top notch research that’s been done, tells a significant story.
At this point, anyone who thinks otherwise, either has not been paying any attention, or has some axe to grind.
An instruction manual on how they did it, you won't find, that's fersure.
Greetings, trisham. It’s not that the guy in the WH is a coward; it’s that he (well, those who put him there, and tell him what to do), have a purpose, a goal. The purpose and goal, as I stated above, is to utterly destroy the USA as a world power for good. And to empower communist and Moslem regimes around the world. It’s simple, and clear, and they’ve done a pretty good job.
If the Rs were not eunuchs, political whores, or complicit (one, two or all three, depending), we would not be in the fix we are in. My hopes are pinned on many in the fedgov, especially the military, standing up and doing their duty, when things get unglued, which I am 100% sure they will get.
Yes.
And how quickly we can spot them now, but from time to time, one or two still slip through the filter. One thing makes them stand out; they never contribute anything useful.
I cannot disagree.
Or they are too darn lazy or tired to read the links or check out the sources provided. It's so much easier to watch a DVD made by some scumbag fraud who has done more to derail discussion than anyone else I can think of, other than the 'academic' who posted the link to the images of the model that he maintains were sent to him by an anonymous genealogist...
It’s funny, trisham - but I am more and more optimistic day by day.
I can’t control it. I think great good will rise from this pit of every-kind-of-evil our country has become. There ARE good people still, and from this and that I hear, plans are being made.
The foulness of leftism/crony crapitalism/rampant immorality etc has gotten so extreme, that good people are getting outraged and courageous, and fence sitters are a good opportunity to realize- to wake up to - exactly how Evil, Evil really is. And where it leads. An object lesson.
And the need for a foundation of moral absolutes.
;-)
Well, “lazy” may fall into the “not paying attention” category.
It’s hard for people new to this to get up to speed, but there is no need to think that they know the score, either!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.