What is provable beyond a doubt a forgery is Obama’s White House birf cert.
It’s an Obama forced error. Lets go back to April, 2011 when Obama went into panic mode as he saw the poll numbers reach into the 50% to 60% questioning his official birth story and Trump was everywhere in the news.
It’s a long limb that the Obama Admin. went out on where it is just begging to be sawed off.
Proof could come as follows,
- if someone found a genuine Hawaiian newspaper from August 1961 where there is no Obama birth announcement.
- or Arpaio got his hands on Sunahara’s birth certificate that has 151-1961-010641 that is the same as Obama’s fake BCs.
- or the so-called missing page 10 or 11 of the Dunham and Obama Sr. divorce decree.
- or the break in and ‘cauterization’ to the Obama’s State Department record just happens they missed the backup data copies. Oh, the government backs up their computer data files in multiples where many are in off-site locations.
- or any number of official documents I haven’t mentioned that can be vetted for authentication. And any of the above in combination that happen to get publicly known.
Are you or anyone here familiar with contradiction and valid arguments using math?
If p then q
~q
therefore ~p
Or as written:
Obama’s HI BC is assigned 151-1961-010641, then Obama’s White House Birth Certificate is genuine.
Obama’s White House BC assigned number is NOT 151-1961-010641.
Therefore Obama’s BC is a forgery.
Simple stuff.
It is the key to unraveling Obama’s past, and for me to have a good time hammering every OBot and alike with it. ;-)
Obama’s HI BC is assigned 151-1961-010641, then Obama’s White House Birth Certificate is genuine.
Flip the position of these two statements to be aligned correctly with,
"If p then q
~q
therefore ~p "
Heehee. ;-)