Just because Brits didn’t use staples in ‘64 doesn’t mean that sometime in the past 40+ years it wasn’t stapled to something.
It's not the Brits I'm talking about, it's their colonial heirs. And it isn't that they didn't use staples in 1964, they were still using straight pins exclusively well into the late 1990's to my personal knowledge.
And it was stapled to something - that's MY point, not yours.
The significant point is that if it WAS stapled to something it would have been stapled somewhere that officials use staples.
Like the USA, for example.
My thoughts exact. Just because the Kenyan/British legal authorities initially may not have used a stapler, does not mean that Stanley Ann Dunham, her lawyer, or whoever else had possession of the document,at any point in time since, for whatever reason, did not either.