“Anyone can post almost anything on Wikipedia, whether it’s true, or not.”
True, but Wiki has sources and the two sources for the claims are given and I have seen them elsewhere.
When assessing claims regarding records I always ask “Is the claim verifiable? Is there a custodian of the document that can be subpoenaed and if they were would their testimony meet the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE)?
In this case, the answer is yes for both Stanley Ann’s record in the HI transcript archive and for the Anthropology Dept. archive.
You just proved my point. Anyone with an agenda can post anything on Wikipedia as long as they ask/ pay a friend to corroborate their lie.