Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: cowboyway
But it demonstrates where the people are; much like a poll.

Ah yes, a poll. If polls are that accurate then John Kerry would have won the election in 2004 wouldn't he?

You know that, but the typical NS MO is to lie, spin and lie some more.

Lying and spinning are your forte.

A yankee judge is in my corner and it's killing you.

Do you realize how ridiculous that is? One judge writes an error-filled essay supporting every Southron myth in the books and that's supposed to bother me? It might, if that Yankee judge knew what he was saying. What if I said that Bill Clinton, a Southern politician, said the South was wrong in rebelling? Would that cause you to lose any sleep?

Huh?

Let me try it again without my typos. Ronald Reagan won the election in 1980 with 50.75% of the popular vote, a bare plurality. But he took 91% of the electoral vote and his election is seen as a landslide victory and a repudiation of Jimmy Carter. Now, would you agree that his election was a resounding beat-down for Jimmy Carter or that he squeaked into office by the skin of his teeth?

You wanna see stupid? Look in the mirror.

I don't need to go that far to deal with stupid. I've got you.

Your sense of self worth is only exceeded by your inability to admit that you're wrong.

Show me where I'm wrong first.

68 posted on 05/06/2009 12:40:54 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

“You wanna see stupid? Look in the mirror.”

That happens with Pokie every morning so he figures it works that way for everyone...


71 posted on 05/06/2009 12:43:26 PM PDT by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
Ah yes, a poll. If polls are that accurate then John Kerry would have won the election in 2004 wouldn't he?

All this spinning must be getting you dizzy. Do you dispute that Lincoln "received only 39 percent of the popular vote" in the 1860 election?

Would that cause you to lose any sleep?

Not me, but you're different. Every time I post something Confederate you're in at the first and stay till the last with the most replies. You're the Nathan Bedford Forrest of Free Republic! You're on this board day and night wielding your mighty pen, ready to vanquish any and all foes who dare to speak out against your beloved Lincoln and big government.

If you really were the great scholar that you often profess to be, I would think that you would be spending your time on more productive pursuits instead of chronically idling in anonymity on an the interweb, posting ad nauseam.

Now, would you agree that his election was a resounding beat-down for Jimmy Carter or that he squeaked into office by the skin of his teeth?

By using electoral college numbers and ignoring popular vote numbers, both Bill Clinton (in 1992) and Barack Obama were landslide victories, also. But you just keep spinning it, NS. You're spinning yourself into a hole.

Show me where I'm wrong first.

See above.

147 posted on 05/07/2009 5:38:46 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson