Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Why be so obtuse??? The answer WAS clearly stated in #1136 as the 9% described there.

And you do seem to have a reading problem since you haven't answered my question from #1136. Instead, you seem to think this is some sort of a game that allows you to make up far-fetched hypothetical examples, pretend they're real, and then take potshots at any FairTax supporter who might respond.

As opposed to unrealistic examples such as those you pose, I've offered to use your own real FairTax effective tax rate to see how you would benefit (or not) in comparison to the income tax - yet you keep ducking out. Why are you afraid of this since you obviously support the income tax??? If it's so great, let's see how it applies in your situation. Just respond to my original #917 (which, you'll note, uses the 9% hidden tax/embedded tax cost figure).

1,140 posted on 09/12/2006 9:50:24 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1137 | View Replies ]


To: pigdog
"Why be so obtuse??? The answer WAS clearly stated in #1136 as the 9% described there."

Terrific! I believe we're actually starting to make some progress.

Now, before we go on, if 9% is what you call the hidden tax cost or hidden taxes, what was that 3.75% number you were throwing around? Didn't you call THAT number the hidden tax?

1,145 posted on 09/12/2006 10:07:29 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson