Posted on 06/18/2006 7:59:34 AM PDT by tomzz
No, its too nonsensical to worry about. Its from answersingenesis.org so that's to be expected. Here is another great piece of scientific research from the same website:
ConclusionsTypical textbooks show the following progression: an apelike knuckle-walking primate, followed by forms which are progressively larger, progressively more bipedal, and progressively more intelligent—all culminating in us modern humans. As we have seen, the scientific evidence shows no such thing.
The relevant evidence clearly shows that Homo sapiens sensu lato is a separate and distinct entity from the other hominids. No overall evolutionary progression is to be found. Adam and Eve, and not the australopiths/habilines, are our actual ancestors. As pointed out by other creationists [e.g., Lubenow9], Homo ergaster, Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, and Homo neanderthalensis can best be understood as racial variants of modern man—all descended from Adam and Eve, and most likely arising after the separation of people groups after Babel.
The non-transitions in ‘human evolution’—on evolutionists’ terms, by John Woodmorappe
I wouldn't want to be associated with that kind of "science" -- would you?
Did you see this?
A common feature of AiG/ICR-type "misstatements" is the pretense that the "Lucy" specimen stands alone as the sole basis for all inferences. This confusion probably arises because you can fool more suckers that way.
How much does that little honey of a video sell for?
...just a little addition to your weekly tithe, that's all it takes. You, too, can debunk well established science!
Suckers, indeed.
Thanks.
How many times have you posted this lie before just to start a flame war, Bat-boy?
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
It could be worth every penny -- if it's free.
Amazing what you can do with plaster of paris; you can even get Algore to look human. How's that movie of his doing? I here it has all sorts of reliable evidence in it, just like Evolution. Than again, Evo's are gullible.
Than again, Evo's are gullible.
But there are some "evo's" out there -- we generally call them, scientists -- who have actually seen the fossils. Unlike you, they have some evidence on which to base their opinions.
"I wouldn't want to be associated with that kind of "science" -- would you?"
I've decided it is a sickness. Anyone who can truly believe in ZAP!, or POOF!, or better yet, "The Jeanie and Major Nelson" story, can't be reasoned with. I'll tell you honestly, I'd rather live eternity in hell than spend 5 minutes in heaven with these fools. Judgement time.
What evidence do you have that we lack? Unlike you, we take what supports the Bible in Evolution, that being "the measurable change in the heritable traits of a population over successive generations," and that, "natural selection is the process by which individual organisms with favorable traits are more likely to survive and reproduce." No problem here, it is the imaginings of neo-Darwinist like yourself that believes that there is evidence of a kind of animal developing to another another kind (like apes to man) that gives the theory a bad name. Do you appreciate the way Nazi's and Communist love neo-Darwinism?
You are letting your religious zeal overwhelm your common sense and common courtesy.
Good night.
Sorry to hurt your feelings (as so many of you go by them), but let's face facts, Nazis, Fascists & Communists are to neo-Darwinism as Christians are to the Bible. Your comeback is so creative (couldn't help it, LOL).
Sleep tight.
Yeh, better that we came from "green goo" than to be accountable to a "Creator!"
Careful what you wish for.......
"Careful what you wish for......."
No, I'm serious. There could be no such thing as "heaven" if I found myself anywhere near a simpleton who couldn't understand simple math.
I hear ya. If I have to spend the afterlife with with these types, hell might be a blessing.
"Than again, Evo's are gullible."
But we aren't the one's who believe God stopped time to give an army a daylight advantage to kill all of their enemies. No, it takes a Creationist to really understand gullible. In fact, let's discuss Gullible and fraud. Jim Bakker? How many complete imbeciles gave most of their earnings to this goob? Jimmy Swaggart? How many simple minded holy rollers were slapping money on this guy before he admitted he was nailing a prostitute and trying to talk her into getting her daughter in on the action? Jim Jones? What a Christian! Yeah boy, looks like the Creationists have ALL of the heavy hitters.
You aren't giving truthful information. If you remember, YOU are the same person who posted the real live Tyranosaur Meat post. BWWHAHA. The only way any Creationist theories can possibly be correct is if everything was ZAPPED into existence in its present state. This is not only impossible, but quite ridiculous. Like I say, send me to hell, I'd get kicked out of heaven for laughing in people's faces anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.