Replies

You know what, with all you babbling, you say nothing.

It stands. You are calling God a liar. God created the world and every living thing in it. If you do not accept His Word, The Bible, you have no capacity for truth.

Yet you hang onto what Kent says. A mere man who depends on God for his every breath. Why do you look up to man? How lowly do you think of yourself? Animals do that - oh I forgot - you belief humans are animals. But then again, I guess Kent's (monkey brain) is an animal too.

Remember, at one time, 'man" said the world was flat. However, those who seek truth knew better - the bible explains it - and doesn't explain it as flat.

So, keep believing man - they are always finding something new and denouncing what they said yesterday.

But God always was, always will be, and will always remain the same. TRUTH DOESN'T CHANGE. On that note - no more chit-chat. I'm not into talking to animals but I do wish you all the best and may you have enough pee-pee pads for all you needs.

You know what, with all you babbling, you say nothing.

Is that your way of saying that you'd rather fabricate my position because you don't know how to address what I've actually said?

It stands. You are calling God a liar.

Wrong. Now you're just lying.

God created the world and every living thing in it. If you do not accept His Word, The Bible, you have no capacity for truth.

You are again assuming your conclusion. You are assuming not only that the Christian God exists, but also that it exists exactly according to the nature that you claim. It is not "lying" for me not to believe you.

Yet you hang onto what Kent says.

I do not "hang onto" what Kent says. I merely point out that he has made demonstratably false claims.

A mere man who depends on God for his every breath.

Non-sequitur.

Why do you look up to man?

What is this supposed to mean?

How lowly do you think of yourself?

I think of myself more highly than I think of you. You've demonstrated that you are fundamentally unwilling to read for comprehension.

Animals do that - oh I forgot - you belief humans are animals.

Are they not? If you disagree with taxonomic classification, please justify your objection to homo sapiens sapiens being classified in Kingdom Animalia.

Now, do you have an argument that actually addresses any points that I've made, or do you wish to continue making up my position for me?

On that note - no more chit-chat.

Oh, okay. You're going to run off like a coward now. Not surprising.