Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Girls Suspected Of Being Lesbians Expelled From School
ClickonDetroit ^ | December 30, 2005 | AP

Posted on 12/30/2005 4:57:09 AM PST by ShadowDancer

Girls Suspected Of Being Lesbians Expelled From School

Teens File Lawsuit Against School

POSTED: 7:23 am EST December 30, 2005

RIVERSIDE, Calif. -- Two 16-year-olds who were expelled from a Lutheran high school because they were suspected of being lesbians have sued the school for invasion of privacy and discrimination.

The lawsuit, filed last week in Riverside County Superior Court, seeks the girls' re-enrollment at the small California Lutheran High School, unspecified damages and an injunction barring the school from excluding gays and lesbians.

Kirk D. Hanson, an attorney for the girls, said the expulsion traumatized and humiliated them.

"Their entire support network was pulled out from under them because of suspicions about their sexual orientation," said Hanson, who declined to say whether his clients are lesbians.

The school is on Christmas break until next week, and messages left for school officials Thursday were not immediately returned.

The lawsuit alleges that the school's principal, Gregory Bork, called the girls into his office, grilled them on their sexual orientation and "coerced" one girl into saying she loved the other.

The next day, the lawsuit says, Bork told the girls' parents they could not stay at the school with "those feelings." In a Sept. 12 letter to the parents, Bork acknowledged that officials had seen no physical contact between the girls but said their friendship was "uncharacteristic of normal girl relationships and more characteristic of a lesbian one."

"Such a relationship violates our Christian Code of Conduct," Bork wrote in his letter, which was included as an exhibit in the lawsuit. He called the girls' behavior "scandalous" and "immoral."

Hanson said the 142-student school in Wildomar, Calif., must comply with state civil rights laws because it functions as a business by collecting tuition.

"There's a lot of hypocrisy going on here," Hanson said. "The school is claiming the girls were expelled because their conduct wasn't within the Christian code. But at the same time, (the school) has students who aren't Christians and are even Jewish."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: christianschools; discipline; homoesexualagenda; lesbians; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-286 next last
To: JimRed

I just broke my own rule; I used the fine old word "gay" in the new perverted manner. I should have said "my homosexual brother".


101 posted on 12/30/2005 6:00:10 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
I love my children now and will love them 30 years from now.

And I suppose you would if they he a sexual orientation for your husband? Animals? And you accepted that as normal? Just one of those things?

It's from that perspective you are defending.

102 posted on 12/30/2005 6:01:06 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Are you seriously drawing a parallel between having sex with animals and being gay? Seriously?


103 posted on 12/30/2005 6:02:31 AM PST by ShadowDancer (I think I may have the Asian Bird Fru. I mean Flu. (Damn, it's starting already))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Gives it a soulful tone I suppose.


104 posted on 12/30/2005 6:03:03 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
"Private, RELIGIOUS school - case closed."

Of course the principal might have been mistaken, in which case there might be recourse with his superiors. Who knows with these fundies?////////S

105 posted on 12/30/2005 6:03:09 AM PST by OldEagle (May you live long enough to hear the legends of your own adventures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

It depends on if the animal is of the same sex or not. hehe


106 posted on 12/30/2005 6:04:02 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: nmh

It's not just abnormal - it is perversion.


107 posted on 12/30/2005 6:04:30 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
I grew up in the 1960s in eastern Massachusetts and we used the word "gay" to mean,more or less,"happy" or "fun" or "carefree".

Ditto
Remember this?....

"Yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyabba-dabba-doooooooo!"

Flintstones... Meet the Flintstones,
They're a modern stoneage family.
From the town of Bedrock,
They're a page right out of history.

Let's ride with the family down the street.
Through the courtesy of Fred's two feet.

When you're with the Flintstones,
have a yabba dabba doo time,
a dabba doo time,
we'll have a gay old time

108 posted on 12/30/2005 6:05:17 AM PST by kanawa (Freaking panty wetting, weakspined bliss-ninny socialist punks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

No wonder Barney had that weird laugh.


109 posted on 12/30/2005 6:06:10 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
Are you seriously drawing a parallel between having sex with animals and being gay? Seriously?

They are all paraphilic disorders. Yes of course. I don't distinguish between pathologies. One disorder is equal to the next. Tell me how they are different? Tell me how a "sexual orientation" for an adult consenting relative is any different.

110 posted on 12/30/2005 6:06:41 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

Don't forget the "gay 90's"--1890's that is.


111 posted on 12/30/2005 6:06:45 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Tell me how they are different? Tell me how a "sexual orientation" for an adult consenting relative is any different.

Sexual attraction to another human being is the same as sexual attraction to a non-human being?

112 posted on 12/30/2005 6:09:51 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Sexual attraction to another human being is the same as sexual attraction to a non-human being? Well, there are those ET's out there doing experiments you know.
113 posted on 12/30/2005 6:12:34 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: moog
"Well, there are those ET's out there doing experiments you know."

Yeah, but they use artificial insemination.

Don't ask me how I know...

;o)
114 posted on 12/30/2005 6:14:13 AM PST by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Sexual attraction to another human being is the same as sexual attraction to a non-human being?

Paraphilia denotes sexual disordered behavior...the "attraction" doesn't distinguish between human or non human. Now if you had an attraction to children how is that not any different? We're not talking about civil liberties here, we are talking about disordered behavior.

115 posted on 12/30/2005 6:16:15 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: moog
No wonder Barney had that weird laugh.

Never thought of that, although I did wonder about The Great Gazoo ;~)

Where Are They Now?.... The Great Gazoo

116 posted on 12/30/2005 6:16:52 AM PST by kanawa (Freaking panty wetting, weakspined bliss-ninny socialist punks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem
Yeah, but they use artificial insemination. Don't ask me how I know... Shall we conduct a probe into this? :)
117 posted on 12/30/2005 6:18:22 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

At least Barney raised Bambam. Now Mr. Slate. hmmm....


118 posted on 12/30/2005 6:19:19 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: moog
"Shall we conduct a probe into this? :)"

LOL!! (but OUCH!!) ;o)
119 posted on 12/30/2005 6:19:32 AM PST by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

we are talking about disordered behavior.


I get lots of disorders wrong. I don't know if something goes in dis order or dis order or dis order or dis order or.....


120 posted on 12/30/2005 6:20:17 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson