Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker
"...but you're lying if you suggest that there's any direct evidence of him outside of the New Testament."

Never read any of Tacitus's work I presume.

Also the Romans would have just loved to romanticize a figure like Jesus Christ and written volumes upon volumes about His life and pursuit contrary to the Roman ways. [Extreme Sarcasm towards the historically challenged]
329 posted on 12/17/2005 11:53:54 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi; Alter Kaker
Never read any of Tacitus's work I presume.

I have. And considering that Tacitus was born twenty years or so after the Crucifixion, that's hardly "direct evidence".

340 posted on 12/17/2005 12:01:16 PM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

To: rollo tomasi
Never read any of Tacitus's work I presume.

Tacitus lived over a hundred years after the time Jesus was supposed to have lived. As such, he's no more reliable than you would be writing of your memories of Abraham Lincoln.

I'm not saying there was no Jesus, just that there's no direct evidence outside of the Christian Bible.

341 posted on 12/17/2005 12:01:32 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson