[VadeRetro]

Post 445 is a nice one. It contains a fairly explicit endorsement of Hovind. Hovind is a creationist buffoon.

My original post was concerning the irony of the ping listers mocking the CREVOs for their numerous straw men all the while claiming Hovind's arguments have no validity while never addressing them specifically for the most part.

Kinda like saying George Bush is a bad president because he says his prayers.

It seems that you are using the same logically fallacy.

You have spent all your posts on this thread screeching at the evos for being mean to the creationists. Are we supposed to believe you're some 1) neutral observer or 2) secular skeptic of evolution? Among the many, many, many things creationists are clearly allowed to lie about are 1) who they are and 2) what they are up to.

How long do you think you can walk like a duck, quack like a duck, and look like a duck before somebody notices?

[js1138]

Creationists are also allowed to hide their light.

[darbymcgill]

How long do you think you can walk like a duck, quack like a duck, and look like a duck before somebody notices?

Is that how you do your science as well? Do you have a preconceived notion of what you "want" your results to look like and therefore all of your observations point you to that conclusion.

How so very scientific of you and as many of those cut from your mold (since I can't use "ilk" anymore) you are..... 100% wrong....

You can attempt to force me into one of you boxes but I refuse to be hammered.... secular skeptic is cute but not even close....

If you can see endorsement of Hovind in 445 then you probably need to seek treatment for your myopia...