I thought ID was a competing theory with evolution. Yet, I see no scientific arguments on here
for ID other than irreducible complexity.
Mostly I see criticisms of evolution: that it "promotes" materialism, moral relativity, robs people of a sense of civilized humanity about themselves & others (i.e.we're nothing but stinky old animals with base instincts)
and that Marx and Hitler, crazy dictators, admired it and pervertedly used it to justify genocide.
Kind of like how Puritans or Christians once used the bible and Christianity to justify drowning, stoning under massive rocks, and burning people alive they thought, THOUGHT were witches. Sometimes for no more reason than the "witch" had a large mole; mostly though, based on gossip and unprovable accusations.
So, I guess those puritans that murdered innocents are a good example of what bible believers today are like, right? Obviously I'm being sarcastic there.
And the argument on this thread by a proID poster that: they ought to teach ID because they already teach gay classes, fisting, and Harry Potter(?)....well hell, I can't argue with that.If those are the standards you all are holding ID to, I'd say it fits in just swell