[pigdog]

The MONEY writer is merely mamking the same (mistaken) pretense made by Robbie on an earlier vanity thread where the pretense was that Jorgenson was claiming wages would fall.

That was not at all what the economist assumed, nor - in fact - what the wording in the article says since it is quite vague and most likely means that Jorgenson was agreeing that he reduced wages IN HIS MODEL.

As has been pointed out to you many times, that means nothing at all in the real working world (no matter how large a font you use to try to give emphasis to the malinterpretation).

The liberal "tax law professor" can hardly be seen as any sort of authority on economics or even taxation (he teaches tax law which deals with the Income Tax as we know it, you see, and not Taxation per se). Quoting a non-authority as an athority is an old left-wing trick, but it has apparently fooled you.

[Always Right]

That was not at all what the economist assumed, nor - in fact - what the wording in the article says since it is quite vague and most likely means that Jorgenson was agreeing that he reduced wages IN HIS MODEL.

Again DUH. That is the fairytax source for saying prices will fall 22%, Jorgenson's model. Get it???? I doubt it. Your twisting and spinning is not impressing anyone.