We can win without murdering millions of civilians.
I hope we can too. I just don't know if anything else can work anymore...these nutcases don't think like we do.
That's NOT how we won WWII. And likely why we are losing too many of OUR soldiers now; pussy-footing around terrorist filled mosques, cities, countries...
Please keep in mind that I believe that Bush said "All" options are on the table if they use WMD, and he even said again he would not limit our military in it's options to protect our troops and country.
Truman didn't.
Would your opinion change if millions of U.S. citizens were murdered in an attack on America, such as the scenario he cites is predicting? Just wondering...
We can win without murdering millions of civilians.
Even if it took a million to win, it would be worth it,
far more than a million American lives, lost because of
Islamic fanatics and backward guilty democrats.
Certainly, if the ChiComms can threaten us with nuclear
weapons over Taiwan, we can threaten Islam with the destruction of Mecca and Medina in the event that ISLAM
attacks us. For make no mistake, those who would attack us
are attacking in the name of Islam, for the goals of Islam.
..."We can win without murdering millions of civilians.
"......
Well, what the hell, the Arabs are enjoying taking out themselves and their children anyway.
Let's stop fighting with one hand behind our back;
Win this war with enough force so that these savages understand that when we leave, "you guys better not screw around or we'll be back with some serious weapons!"
"We can win without murdering millions of civilians."
Too bad their "civilians" are future terrorists.
Cook 'em.