[Truthsayer20]

One thing you are missing is that voting patterns in California do not support the kind of ethnic stratification you are projecting. According to the 2004 exit polls, Bush barely won the white vote in CA and lost the white female vote overwhelmingly.

My point is that being white does not by a long shot make one a friend of Western civilization. Rejection of crude tribalism is one the reasons the West has thrived. Japan is a case study of an advanced society in a downward spiral (and with much bigger problems than the US) despite its homogenous population.

[wardaddy]

Actually.

As a Southerner. I can say with certainty that whites in my Demographic vote conservative overwhelmingly...87% for W in 2004 in my homestate of Mississippi.

But you do raise flaws in my argument when you compare whites to Japan or to Kali libs.

Still, the fact remains that at least 2/3rds of Hispanics nationwide vote liberal and even that is somewhat skewed by the way Cubans vote so strongly Conservative.

Nationwide, it is "white" male and married "white" female voting patterns that keep our head above water.

We have added perhaps Japanese and Vietnamese to that as well. I'm not sure about Chinese. In NYC and SF they seem pretty lib.

Cubans, Arab Christians, and maybe subcontinent Indians all vote Right as well but they are Caucasian too.

What you have touched on is that race is only one component and not a responsible one. I don't think the color of one's skin nor the texture of their hair makes them vote a certain way.

But their culture might well.

Likewise the fact that they do vote a certain way is without question.

The fact that race can be part of this issue is not an excuse not to act.

And again, I'm unaware of any nation in history being asked to fall on their sword this way. Never.