[spodefly]

No, I consider it baiting when I post what would on a normal thread be considered at least a semi-thoughtful post and all I get back is the same smarmy passive-aggressive innuendo and broad brushing from the same 3 individuals that have made themselves a reputation for such on any thread about illegal aliens for the past several months.

[Travis McGee]

Don't waste your time arguing with those who are agents of a foreign government, with an interest in promoting a parasitic relationship with America. What's the point?

"You couldn't beat the Mexicans lead by brother Santa Anna at the Alamo - You're certainly not going to beat Mara Salvatrucha with a bunch of fat old ex-supply sergeants."

[ClintonBeGone]

No, I consider it baiting when I post what would on a normal thread be considered at least a semi-thoughtful post and all I get back is the same smarmy passive-aggressive innuendo and broad brushing from the same 3 individuals that have made themselves a reputation for such on any thread about illegal aliens for the past several months.

A few questions: What would be a non-smarmy way to disagree with you? Does name calling and foul language meet the definition of passive-agressive? And, finally, are these 'same 3 individuals' automatically disqualified from engaging in debate with you?