Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
I don't see it as an inconsistency. Unlike you, I don't see it as "since drug A is legal then drug B must also be legal"

I never made any since A then B arguement. I am arguing for consistancy, and if you can go back to the scheduling criteria and not see it being applied inconsistantly then I can reason with you no further.

150 posted on 02/01/2005 2:04:55 PM PST by bird4four4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: bird4four4

You do favor all drugs being legal, don't you? Including prescription drugs? Not just marijuana, correct? And to all ages, or would you arbitrarily pick a number and make that a minimum age? Could you then explain and defend your choice of that age?


151 posted on 02/01/2005 2:20:23 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson