An accusation within a statement. My, my. I never said we are saved without the remission of sins. Please show the post to me and I'll correct the error.
Perhaps I haven't been clear in my explanation. Please see the following article which better articulate my views.
"I never said we are saved without the remission of sins"
You didn't come right out and say that, and yet, you implied it. You say that baptism is not necessary for salvation, and yet the Word of God says that baptism is for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38), which you agree is necessary for salvation. Logically, you can't hold both positions. So, which is it?