Full of crap again
Just can't wait to spew your crap again
You just love spewing nonsense with your friends
And I just can't wait to see you spew again
Full of crap again
Goin' places reality's never been
Dreamin' things you may never dream again,
And I just can't wait to see you spew again.
[capitan_refugio #650] Don't be coy - why don't you just cite your proof? I'm not into playing your games right now. You still haven't shown it was the same person.
I'm not being coy, I am merely rubbing your nose in your do-do. I am demonstrating that, yet again, the lying sack of s--- called capitan_refugio went on and on and on about a court opinion he has neither seen nor read.
There is no game. I gave you the citation and the precise page number and the location of the precise line to read. You have only two problems, first is that, yet again, you have not read the opinion that you have gone on and on and on about and second, you can't find it with your Google engine. You are busted again.
[nc #613] I would recommend you read the opinion in WHITE v. HART, 80 U.S. 646 (1871) at 647, the line following "ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia." Then get back to me with your next brilliant observation.
[capitan_refugio #559] On the contrary, liar. You made the association that the "White" in the three cases was the same. I made a very simple observation (so that you and the other crackers could understand it): "George W. White" was the White in Texas v White. That name does not register any hits when associated with either of the other two cases; nor does "George White," nor does "G. White." I made no search for who the "Whites" were in the other cases. If you know who they were, then post it. Otherwise, stand accused of misrepresentation - again.
[nc #547] You must be correct. You do not find the name George in the Supreme Court decisions re Hart or Cannon. Of course, you do not find any other first name in those decisions either. Correct me if I am wrong.
[capitan_refugio #543] The "White" in Texas v White was George W. White. I do not find his name associated with White v Hart or White v Cannon. Correct me if I'm wrong.
No, you're just being the a-hole you normally are. Par for the course.
You made a boast. You can't or won't back it up. And you act like an insufferable pr*ck when you're called on it. That's nolu coward all over!
If you have the proof, post it. Argument over. Instead you want to play little games. Okay, smart a$$ - show post where I said I had read the decisions. I never said anything like that, liar. I said, I found no association of the name George W. White (or its derivations) with the other two cases. That's not "going on and on." It is stating a simple fact that your pea brain is incapable of understanding.