"Darwinist arguments often assume that intelligent design, for example, is antievolution
"
Its not an assumption. ID inserts the same idiotic claim that the TOE speculates on original creation. IT DOESN'T!
Why would an omniscient and omnipotent God have to continually intervene in a system He designed (evolution)?
How could you tell if He did? ID is not science. It is an attempt to insert your cult into schools. If your kids learn ID instead of biology, they will be more stupid than my grandkids and lose all the good jobs to them.
Your argument against ID (for the purpose of defending your belief system) requires the God-connection, not mine. The "I" could be represented in many forms. It is your dogma that demands the Christian God is connected to any challenge of evolution. Like I said, evolution makes aetheism intellectually fulfilling
How could you tell if He did? ID is not science. It is an attempt to insert your cult into schools. If your kids learn ID instead of biology, they will be more stupid than my grandkids and lose all the good jobs to them.
That's a pretty stupid leap in itself. Both are belief systems and neither is proveable.