"What "Creation"?"
Yes, there are many myths, the Genesis Creation account stands up to scientific laws/principles.
"ignorant of scientific terminology and those trying to play dishonest semantic games."
This seems prevalent from the evolution side of this discussion. I don't clain to be an expert, but I am not totally ignorant or dishonest.
"Really? Could you elaborate on this, or do you think that simply asserting it and running off is sufficient to make a reasoned argument?"
On what do you base this "running off" theory? You need more data.
In a nutshell, Creation is more in line with the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics than evolution. Something does not come from nothing and the organized tends toward disorganization.
The expanding universe shows it had a beginning and requires an outside source. "Chance" is unlikely, our planets and the life on it requires very specific conditions. There was a plan. There is adaptaion but not evolution. Genetic code does not allow reproduction outside of a species. Homology can show similarities but not relation.