"So a heresy is embedded in the words of consecration of the vernacular New Mass. That is the very sad and unfortunate fact."
Seems like that would be easy to correct, since it can be called a "translation problem."
"Oh, the Latin says 'multis?' Hey, no problem. I'll just line out 'all' here and write in 'many.' Stroke of the pen, heresy be gone. Kinda cool."
"Stroke of the pen, heresy be gone."
Ecclesia Dei
Stroke of the pen, traditional Catholicism be gone.
Not!
Very true. At any time in the last 35 years, with a single stroke of a pen, the hesesy embedded in the vernacular New Mass could have been eliminated. And as you point out, there is even a good cover story to avoid embarrassment: "It was just a translation error." It would require much less effort than writing a book of poetry, or even hosting breakdancers at the Vatican.
So the fact that 35 years have gone by without correcting the most blatant and egregious of all the errors in the New Mass tells us something about the people that are running the hierarchy. They have no desire or intention to do so. They WANT there to be a heresy embedded in the very words of consecration. They are satisfied, even pleased, to know that the New Mass offered in the vernacular is of doubtful validity.