To: balrog666; PatrickHenry
At least explain to me how you "square" abiogenesis with the Second Law of Thermodynamics. 'Cause I sure can't figure out any way to do it.
To: betty boop
At least explain to me how you "square" abiogenesis with the Second Law of Thermodynamics. 'Cause I sure can't figure out any way to do it.Square the existence of life with the Second Law.
338 posted on
07/06/2004 12:28:45 PM PDT by
js1138
(In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
To: betty boop
At least explain to me how you "square" abiogenesis with the Second Law of Thermodynamics. 'Cause I sure can't figure out any way to do it. BB, you've been in and out of these threads long enough to know quite well that no one yet has worked out the method by which life first began. There are some ideas about it, but nothing's been demonstrated yet. However, I doubt that the Second Law is a problem. The energy for the first living molecules probably came from the same source as the energy that sustains a tree. It's the sun.
345 posted on
07/06/2004 12:55:51 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: betty boop
Let's test your understanding, balrog: Give a rational defense of abiogensis based on evidence. At least explain to me how you "square" abiogenesis with the Second Law of Thermodynamics. 'Cause I sure can't figure out any way to do it.
All right, who are you and what did you do with the real Betty Boop?
351 posted on
07/06/2004 1:10:47 PM PDT by
balrog666
(A public service post.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson