To: Reagan Man
The anger expressed by conservatives toward President Bush is primarily focused on two issues: border security/immigration and federal spending. Don't forget CFR.
The best choice for conservatives; the best candidate to advance our agenda; and the best person in which to put our hope and faith is President George W. Bush.
When selecting between Jeffrey Dahmer and Michael Jackson to babysit your children, the best choice is obvious. That doesn't mean you should shut up and be happy about it.
On the two previously mentioned issues of immigration policy and federal spending, conservatives only need to look at the alternatives to see that President Bush is the right person for the job. Regarding immigration policy, if Sen. Kerry were to become America's next president, there would be no need to debate the merits of granting legal status to a portion of illegal immigrants... [etc.]
If Kerry or one of the other Demwits was president, then the GOP Congress would stonewall on such things. In other words, why didn't Clinton overspend as much as Bush? Because he had to push budgets through an adversarial Congress. Gridlock rules!
The only part that really sucks about having a DemonRat president is the judicial nominations. :(
15 posted on
01/26/2004 1:58:10 PM PST by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
To: Sloth
Many in the military and their families want Bush as their CIC and consider it very important that he be elected.
33 posted on
01/26/2004 2:08:14 PM PST by
MEG33
(America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
To: Sloth
The only part that really sucks about having a DemonRat president is the judicial nominations. :(
Which is a MAJOR reason to support Bush (How would you like the 9th circus clowns ruling become the norm??)
To: Sloth
The anger expressed by conservatives toward President Bush is primarily focused on two issues: border security/immigration and federal spending.
Don't forget CFR.
And don't forget his support for extending the Clinton Gun Ban.
To: Sloth
Re:
Gridlock rules! The people haven't sent the DNC into majority power in 2 successive elections (2000 and 2002). Why would you argue for something (Majority DNC control of the house and/or senate) that doesn't jive with the will of the people?
2000 and 2002:
1) The DNC spoke
2) The people listened and did not grant them majority power, twice.
3) You argue that their lack of a mandate is a bad thing . . . why ?
52 posted on
01/26/2004 2:50:16 PM PST by
ChadGore
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: Ahban
Particularly good reply
79 posted on
01/26/2004 3:30:42 PM PST by
TheBattman
(Miserable failure = http://www.michaelmoore.com)
To: Sloth
The only part that really sucks about having a DemonRat president is the judicial nominations. :(You can't leave out foreign policy and, most of all, national defense.
109 posted on
01/26/2004 4:06:11 PM PST by
rdb3
(If Jesse Jack$on and I meet, face to face, it's gonna be a misunderstanding...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson