[netmilsmom]

Condi is "reluctantly" pro-choice. Until I know more about what this means (she is refusing to talk about it, but will as a candidate), I will be for her. When she explains herself farther (to vote pro-choice) or (as I suspect) renounces that stance, I will decide for/against her. Until this is explained, I have to go with her. If she intends to remain pro-choice, then I am wrong.
Are you willing to take someone who is less of a threat to H. Clinton and is pro-life while Condi can defeat Clinton while she votes pro-life no matter what her convictions are? I think as long as she runs pro-life, she is tons better than Clinton.
I like the "Rice/Bush 2008" ticket right now.

[wideawake]

I will only vote for candidates who are on the record as opposing abortion on demand.

If a candidate has doubts about the sanctity of human life, I will not vote for that candidate.