[small_l_libertarian]

If he is, I'm gonna seriously have a heart attack. Haven't gotten that far in the transcripts yet. I'm just starting the afternoon session of March 12th, preliminary hearing.

Do you know the answer?

[sawsalimb]

nope-gotta go look. But if Ott has been credibly accused of falsifying(or otherwise tampering) with evidence in other cases(Is he the detective who was formally reprimanded for evidence tampering on another case? think so...),as far as I'm concerned,the prosecution's case just turned into a slowly expanding cloud of sub atomic particles. Of course that's me talking,and my vote doesn't count.