Forgot to add, Feldman didn't mention it either. Unlike the PROSECUTION, DEFENSE is not allowed to use IMAGINARY EVIDENCE. I.E. Feldman couldn't say a TOOTH was used to plant DNA if he had no evidence of a TOOTH in possession of the SDPD.
DUSEK, however, is trying to convict DW on a 'missing' blue blanket, 'missing' black boots', orange/blue/grey fibers from an 'unknown' source, and an 'imaginary' RAPE!
"Unlike the PROSECUTION, DEFENSE is not allowed to use IMAGINARY EVIDENCE. I.E. Feldman couldn't say a TOOTH was used to plant DNA if he had no evidence of a TOOTH in possession of the SDPD."
No, no. I didn't mean that. I meant he didn't mention
being able to extract DNA from teeth. Not in reference
to planting evidence. Feldaman could have inquired about
DNA from teeth.