Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
I'm positive SD LE had no idea about DNA extraction
on a tooth! I thought the forensics dentist would
mention it, he didn't. I thought the ME would mention
it, he didn't. I thought *someone anyone* in forensics
would mention it (including Doosuk or Clarke), they
didn't.
743 posted on 08/15/2002 6:41:48 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies ]


To: the Deejay
I'm positive SD LE had no idea about DNA extraction on a tooth! I thought the forensics dentist would mention it, he didn't. I thought the ME would mention it, he didn't. I thought *someone anyone* in forensics would mention it (including Doosuk or Clarke), they didn't.

Well, does that tell us anything? It wouldn't be my first thought, if I wanted to plant DNA on something. But then I am not an EXPERIENCED DETECTIVE, who studies these type of things, testifies in trials to these kind of things, and who has been caught planting evidence before. (Might have figured out a better technique, to avoid detection)

751 posted on 08/15/2002 6:52:45 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies ]

To: the Deejay; UCANSEE2
Yes...this just adds the more to the unanswered questions surrounding this case.

Also, the tooth may have been taken out shortly after her death, before bad decomposition set in..or God forbid, as others have talked about earlier, it could have been extracted whilst she was alive. :-(
761 posted on 08/15/2002 7:09:43 PM PDT by domestice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson