[spectre]

Your logic is correct. It WAS testified that the bone and tissue holding the teeth in tact had degenerated and caused them to loosen.

But what other conclusion would Dusek want the Jury to believe, other than her teeth were "knocked" down her throat.

THIS is the same Dusek, who made-up the rape-scene, "BANG-BANG-BANG"-, against the MH headboard.

If that wasn't misstating the evidence, I don't know what was!

"Objection, Your honor, misstates the evidence", should have been entered.

sw

[MizSterious]

I object that so little common sense is being used in this case, your honor!

Seriously, the head banging scenario defies all logic--this is a wee child, barely four feet tall, and Westerfield is a tall man, over six feet tall. Whose head would be banging against the headboard? If it occurred on that bed, where was the blood? Where was the sperm? We now know that drycleaning does not remove all traces, only the visible traces. If the bedding being drycleaned had been blood and sperm-soaked, it would have shown up with testing. Given Dusek's desire NEED to convict in this case, you can be sure that those tests were done, and that they came up with zilch.

[UCANSEE2]

"Objection, Your honor, misstates the evidence", should have been entered

And as we all saw, JUDGE MUDD would have been saying OVERRULED before Feldman could even finish the sentence.