Posted on 08/14/2002 9:29:21 PM PDT by FresnoDA
I was listening to a tape of Brenda testify at the trial. She said "we looked everywhere for Danielle, under the bed, in the closets..blah, blah...everywhere".
So if they looked EVERYWHERE, under the bed and in the closets, why weren't their fingerprints in her room? Or was it JUST Danielle's prints that weren't in her own room?
I suppose, in this case, it doesn't mean a thing...sigh.
Night all. Tomorrow, Friday...maybe a verdict...maybe just a half a day?
sw
That might be where Feldman was going when he questioned Keene about which officers were in the MH. Of course, he wasn't allowed to go very far on that issue.
If you think about all the things Feldman tried to bring out, you'll see a very clear picture of police tampering with evidence. IMO
All fingerprints were wiped clean. After all, they want to give their scapegoat an even chance to walk.
Couldn't agree more!
Goodnight all!!
wonders, calawah98, Centaur,TamiPie, lacylu, Azonie,BullDog108,Space Wrangler,Iaf97, Guenevere, SilentWitness
Here is the LATEST PING LIST, for whoever makes a new thread.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I GOTTA GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CU ALL LATER !!!!!!!!!!!!!
UCANSEE2, FresnoDA, Mrs. Liberty, demsux, MizSterious, Jaded, skipjackcity, RnMomof7, spectre, BARLF, Valpal1, FriarTom, DoughtyOne, Travis McGee,Hillarys Lovely Legs, fivecatsandadog, Mommya, ~kim4vrwc's~, goldenstategirl, Politicalmom, southflanknorthpawsis, Lauratealeaf, mini_teacup, Snow Bunny, Alamo-Girl, Republican Wildcat, Fred Mertz, onyx, SusanUSA, MdmKoochie , fnord, Uni-Poster, TXDeb, tutstar, theirjustdue, notpoliticallycor ewrecked, lady reaper, Beach_Babe, brneyedgirl, wonders, HoHoeHeaux, vacrn, Karson, sbnsd, Rheo, John Jamieson, rolling_stone, wirestripper, Jhoffa_, GummyIII,Lanza, sneakypete, Shezza, Dudley, Winstar1k, is_is, Wednesdays Child, Donzerly lights, Mrs.OStrategery, pinz-n-needlez, Angelique, Jdontom, Nancie, Tiger28, sunshine state, Henrietta, pubmom, Spunky, its me, TexKat, gigi, Yeti, alexandria, luv2lurkhere, JudyB1938, cyncooper, pyx, SheLion, Dread78645, juzcuz, helpisontheway, Lorraine, Kayti, Krodg, afraidfortherepublic, jokar, itsahoot, Rightfield, hoosiermama, greenishness, zip ,bolthead,fussybutt,the-gooroo,redhawk, tetelestai,Cudjo,billbears, the Deejay, jacquej, let freedom sing, nycgal, hergus, tutstar, ThinkingMan, Mrs.Liberty, Jacy29,Steve0113,countess,HoneyBoo,basscleff,Jrabbit,MagnoliaMS, imready,theartfuldodger,Granof8,TheOtherHarry,amazed, james_hayes, ItsOurTimeNow,domestice,teledude,I. Ben Hurt, ican'tbelieveit,CAPPSMADNESS,WINODOG,Naturegirl,demsux,carenot,kerensky,L.TOWM,wonders, calawah98, Centaur,TamiPie, lacylu, Azonie,BullDog108,Space Wrangler,Iaf97, Guenevere, SilentWitness
sw
The video rental bit concers Robert Bork, who rented "The Parent Trap", "The Sound of Music", "Birth of a Nation", "Silent Scream", and "Triumph of the Will".
Thomas was covered by the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (the "Bork bill").
And they will justify every action "because we have two fine boys left to bring up".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.