“Critical Drinker himself churns out the same tired review and opinion about everything.
His schtick (as formulaic and repetitive of most of the movies he reviews) sadly works for 95% of the Hollywood products...”
We must be seeing different Critical Drinker reviews. I find them to be original, insightful, well-presented and entertaining.
That doesn’t mean it can’t be done better. Are you stepping up or are you simply content to criticize the efforts of others?
“’Critical Drinker himself churns out the same tired review and opinion about everything . . .His schtick is as formulaic and repetitive as most of the movies he reviews. .’
. . . Are you stepping up or are you simply content to criticize the efforts of others?”
So, your defense of a critic who makes a living being a critic the efforts of others is to demand I also make content?
Do you also demand that the Critical Drinker write, produce, and direct movies like the one he “reviews”?
How about, instead, we agree to disagree?
If his schtick is not tired and repetitive to you as it is to me, you watch him, and I do not.