Agreed!!!!
Sydney Sweeney broke big with a couple of nudie projects that showed off her two great acting assets. (I'm not saying she can't act; that's just not what made her a hot tamale to the casting directors.) Since then, she's been trying to rebrand herself as a serious actress, with very mixed results. Her problem is that she has a huge fanbase that watches to see her get nekkid, and that's what the studios want to cast her for. She obviously fights for roles now in which she doesn't have to take her clothes off, but that fanbase doesn't turn out for those.
Emilia Clarke had the same problem after Game of Thrones. Production of GOT stretched over ten years, during which she was 23 to about 33. The first couple of seasons, HBO relentlessly sexualized her. She didn't like it, cried a lot, but was young, felt powerless, and felt that she was bullied into it. She finally rebelled, and the male actors backed her up. Two brain aneurisms also probably put her in the "whatever Emilia wants, Emilia gets" category. HBO backed off considerably in the later seasons. But now there's nekkid 23 year old Emilia out there, and that's what a lot of fans come to see. Her career has drifted since GOT. She's done some nudity since, but she's been trying to tone it down.
She is actually very good in Ponies, a Peacock show that released in January. It's a spy vs. spy action drama set in Moscow in 1976-77, broadly comic with enough drama and character development to keep it grounded. She's right-aged for the role, and she keeps her clothes on -- even in her very dangerous sex scene, when she's running a honeytrap operation on a KGB villain.
That's the kind of role Sydney Sweeney seems to want to find. But will the studios hire her for that?