EXACTLY! Man cannot be alone.
He didn't create man because women can't be alone! Because we can!!
LOL!! Oooohhhh, thank you.
A_perfect_lady: EXACTLY! Man cannot be alone. He didn't create man because women can't be alone! Because we can!! LOL!! Oooohhhh, thank you.
This is a textbook example of the formal logical fallacy known as Illicitly Converting a Conditional
A_perfect_lady implicitly treats rollo tomasi's original statement as if it were a biconditional / two-way. This is the classic invalid form:
𝑃 → 𝑄and the fallacious inference:
Then 𝑄 → 𝑃which does not follow from the original conditional.
A_perfect_lady has advanced an argument which flies in the face of Formal Logic.
Q.E.D.
Regards,