[TwelveOfTwenty]

Unless they’ve come up with a way to make babies without men, every one of those babies has a father who made the choice to ram it into the woman.

[T.B. Yoits]

Unless they’ve come up with a way to make babies without men, every one of those babies has a father who made the choice to ram it into the woman.

Again, the article is about men opting out. FEWER men are making the choice to "ram it into the woman". It's not just a collapse in marriage rates, it's a decline in birthrates.

So, the number of "every one of those babies" is trending -1, -10, -100, -1000, etc.

[alexander_busek]

Unless they’ve come up with a way to make babies without men, every one of those babies has a father who made the choice to ram it into the woman.

Again with the blurring of lines and the failure to clearly distinguish between "men" and some men!

If you want to rigorously discuss (and hopefully solve) a problem, greater linguistic precision is vital!

20% of the men are siring 80% of the children in a certain important American demographic. If this continues, the ratio might get even worse. This amounts to serial polygyny - only the participants ain't gettin' married. It is, in any case, a form of harem-formation.

So don't (by omission) try to spread the blame!

Regards,