Yes, but a higher percentage than ever is raising them alone. When those kids are old enough to vote and are running the country, who do you think they are going to favor when it comes time to hand out the benefits? The mothers who raised them, or you?
(On a related note, having children to take care of you in your old age is damn selfish and completely dehumanizing to those children).
Maybe so, but that doesn't refute the economics of it.
Feminism didn't free women from the oppression they were told they were under, it freed men from the oppression they didn't know they were under.
Based on your post #16, that porn activism doesn't appear to be working too well.
Women's. It's already their problem. As the article points out, men are opting out.
That reply doesn't address the issue you're replying to, which is that future generations raised by women won't care about men. Whose problem will that be?
You're making the case of those opting out of an extortion racket, because that's exactly what that is. "If you don't get married, we'll vote and USE GOVERNMENT to run the country to your disadvantage."
Women chose government for security and are raising "son-husbands" as Kevin Samuels accurately described them, but it's not turning out as they hoped.
Again, women's. It already is.
The largest demographic of single-motherhood is black women, and the largest demographic of single, never married, no children is black men.
Pookie and Ray Ray ain't gonna pay her bills, and while she and others like her decided to use government to force men to pay them, we're $140 Trillion in the hole, while more and more men opt out.
They really thought men would tolerate it and they were correct for two generations. When it started failing, they figured they'd bring in foreigners to take the same bad deal. Unfortunately, it hasn't worked well and the systems are failing.
There's no unringing that bell. Men have taken the red pill and even the black pill.