Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: T.B. Yoits
Must challenge only one of your assertions:

A doctor is required to get a wife's approval before a husband gets a vasectomy but can prescribe birth control or abort a child without the husband knowing.

Could find absolutely no evidence for such an assertion.

At most, in earlier eras (e.g., the 1950s), some hospitals may have had policies in place which informally allowed physicians / hospital administrators to "gatekeep" and require spousal approval - but that most certainly went in both directions; and in all likelihood, men seeking vasectomies encountered fewer such informal barriers than women seeking sterilization.

You raise multiple excellent arguments, T.B. Yoits, but I find this one claim rather specious.

Regards,

146 posted on 05/23/2026 10:14:20 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek
Could find absolutely no evidence for such an assertion [that a doctor is required to get a wife's approval before a husband gets a vasectomy].

At most, in earlier eras (e.g., the 1950s), some hospitals may have had policies in place which informally allowed physicians / hospital administrators to "gatekeep" and require spousal approval...

...I find this one claim rather specious.

It's not hospitals, it's the urologist avoiding litigation from the wife who can be a party to the lawsuit if the vasectomy doesn't take. That's the given reason but it's the same result - many urologists will not perform a vasectomy on a married man without the wife's approval.

158 posted on 05/23/2026 11:01:16 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson